网站版权 © 《油气储运》编辑部 陕ICP备11014090号-10
地址：河北省廊坊市金光道51号（065000）；电话：0316-2176193 / 0316-2072055； 传真:0316-2177392； 网址：yqcy.paperonce.org
技术支持：西安三才科技实业有限公司 029-89381847；029-88222991
[1]何利民,吕宇玲,杨东海,等.能源转型与人工智能时代油气储运本科教育应对策略[J].油气储运,2022,41(06):694-701.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.06.011]
HE Limin,LYU Yuling,YANG Donghai,et al.Strategies for undergraduate education of oil & gas storage and transportation in the era of energy transformation and artificial intelligence[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2022,41(06):694-701.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.06.011]
点击复制
HE Limin,LYU Yuling,YANG Donghai,et al.Strategies for undergraduate education of oil & gas storage and transportation in the era of energy transformation and artificial intelligence[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2022,41(06):694-701.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.06.011]
能源转型与人工智能时代油气储运本科教育应对策略
《油气储运》[ISSN:1000-8241/CN:13-1093/TE]
卷:
41
期数:
2022年06期
页码:
694-701
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-06-25
- Title:
- Strategies for undergraduate education of oil & gas storage and transportation in the era of energy transformation and artificial intelligence
- 文章编号:
- 1000-8241（2022）06-0694-08
- Keywords:
- Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation Engineering; engineering education; curriculum structure; curriculum system; regression to engineering practice
- 分类号:
- TE89
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 回顾与分析了70年来中国油气储运工程专业课程体系变化，发现油气储运工程教育从创建专业之初重视工程实践能力培养，逐渐转向注重科学研究能力的培养，与当今国际工程教育发展方向存在差异。根据高校教师梯队现状，结合国家能源转型与人工智能时代对油气储运工程人才的需求，指出目前油气储运工程教育存在的主要问题是青年教师工程实践能力欠缺、人才培养目标与国际工程教育发展趋势不吻合、学生缺少系统的知识应用环节训练、课程体系不能适应新时代需求、教学方法不能调动学生的学习主动性等。为此，提出了有针对性的应对策略：建立教师工程能力培养制度，确立跨学科复合型人才为油气储运工程专业学生的培养目标，采用理论与实践融合性课程结构，构建“工程+智能”课程体系，应用基于项目的教学方法。研究结果可为新时代油气储运本科教育回归工程实践能力培养提供参考。（表1，参18）
- Abstract:
- In this paper, changes in the curriculum system of Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation Engineering (OGSTE) in China over the past 70 years were reviewed and analyzed. It is found that the focus of OGSTE education has gradually shifted from the cultivation of engineering practice ability at the beginning to the cultivation of scientific research ability, which is different from the development direction of international engineering education. Therefore, the main problems of OGSTE education at present were pointed out based on the status of teachers of the colleges and universities, with consideration to the OGSTE requirements for talents in the era of national energy transformation and artificial intelligence, including inadequate engineering practice ability of the young teachers, inconsistency of talent cultivation objective with the development of international engineering education, lack of systematic training of students in knowledge application, failure of the curriculum system to meet the requirements of the new era, and failure of the teaching methods to mobilize the learning initiative of students. Therefore, strategies were proposed in a targeted manner as follows: to establish the teacher engineering ability training system, set the OGSTE training goal of cultivating interdisciplinary talents, adopt the integrated curriculum structure of theory and practice, build an “engineering + intelligence” curriculum system, and apply the project-based teaching methods. Conclusively, the research results could provide reference for returning the OGSTE undergraduate education in the new era to the cultivation of engineering practice ability. (1 Table, 18 References)
参考文献/References:
[1] 唐玲珊. 回归工程实践：20世纪80年代以来美国高等工程教育变革研究[D].成都：四川师范大学，2021. TANG L S. Returning to engineering practice: A Study on the reform of American higher engineering education since 1980s[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan Normal University, 2021.
[2] 余天佐，刘少雪.从外部评估转向自我改进——美国工程教育专业认证标准EC2000的变革及启示[J].高等工程教育研究， 2014（6）：28-34. YU T Z, LIU S X. From external assessment to self-improvement: the reform of EC2000 and its implications[J]. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2014(6): 28-34.
[3] 黄维和，郑洪龙，李明菲.中国油气行业发展历程及展望[J].油气储运，2019，38（1）：1-11. HUANG W H, ZHENG H L, LI M F. Development history and prospect of oil & gas storage and transportation industry in China[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2019, 38(1): 1-11.
[4] 黄维和，王军，黄龑，梁严，郑龙烨.“碳中和”下我国油气行业转型对策研究[J].油气与新能源，2021（2）：1-5. HUANG W H, WANG J, HUANG Y, LIANG Y, ZHENG L Y. “Carbon neutrality” oriented transformation strategies for China’s petroleum industry[J]. Petroleum Planning &Engineering, 2021(2): 1-5.
[5] 任东明.推进新时代能源转型发展应特别关注的若干重大问题[J].中国能源，2021，43（3）：7-11. REN D M. Several major issues that should be paid special attention to in promoting the transformation and development of energy in the new era[J]. Energy of China, 2021, 43(3): 7-11.
[6] 王震，和旭，崔忻.“碳中和”愿景下油气企业的战略选择[J].油气储运，2021，40（6）：601-608. WANG Z, HE X, CUI X. Strategic choice for oil and gas companies under the vision of carbon neutrality[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2021, 40(6): 601-608.
[7] 侯梅芳，潘松圻，刘翰林.世界能源转型大势与中国油气可持续发展战略[J].天然气工业，2021，41（12）：9-16. HOU M F, PAN S Q, LIU H L. World energy trend and China’s oil and gas sustainable development strategies[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(12): 9-16.
[8] 邹才能，薛华庆，熊波，张国生，潘松圻，贾成业，等.“碳中和”的内涵、创新与愿景[J].天然气工业，2021，41（8）：46-57. ZOU C N, XUE H Q, XIONG B, ZHANG G S, PAN S Q, JIA C Y, et al. Connotation, innovation and vision of “Carbon neutrality”[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(8): 46-57.
[9] 李骅锦，何雨森，范占锋.人工智能时代工程教育的挑战及应对[J].决策咨询，2021（3）：86-88，96. LI H J, HE Y S, FAN Z F. Challenges and countermeasures of engineering education in the era of artificial intelligence[J]. Decision-Making & Consultancy，2021(3): 86-88, 96.
[10] 朱燕祥，王勇军.人工智能时代背景下高等教育面临的挑战与变革[J]. 教育教学论坛，2020（13）：101-103. ZHU Y X, WANG Y J. The challenges and revolution faced by our higher education in the context of artificial intelligence[J]. jiaoyu jiaoxue luntan, 2020(13): 101-103.
[11] 孔寒冰，叶民.国际视角的工程教育模式创新研究[M].杭州：浙江大学出版社，2014：1-173. KONG H B, YE M. Research on the innovation of engineering education model from an international perspective[M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2014:1-173.
[12] MOSES J . Engineering with A Big E: integrative engineering education[R]. School of Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, 1994.
[13] 崔军.整体工程观视野下的工程师和工程教育改革[J].中国大学教学，2016（10）：37-42. CUI J. Engineer and engineering education reform from the perspective of holistic engineering view[J]. China University Teaching, 2016(10): 37-42.
[14] 邹晓东，翁默斯，姚威.基于大E理念与整体观的综合工程教育理念建构[J].高等工程教育研究，2015（6）:11-16. ZOU X D, WENG M S, YAO W. A study on the notion construction of integrated engineering education based on the“E” concept and holistic engineering education[J]. Research in Higher Education of Engineering, 2015(6): 11-16.
[15] 克劳雷·爱德华，梅姆奎斯特·约翰，奥斯顿·索伦，布罗德·唐·R.重新认识工程教育——国际CDIO培养模式与方法[M].顾佩华，沈民奋，陆小华，译.北京：高等教育出版社，2009：1-196. CRAWLAY E, MAIMQVIST J, OSTUND S, BRODEUR D R. Reunderstanding engineering education—International CDIO training mode and method[M]. GU P H, SHEN M F, LU X H, translated. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2009: 1-196.
[16] 中国石油学会. 2016—2017油气储运工程学科发展报告[M].北京：中国科学技术出版社，2018：1-3. Chinese Petroleum Society. 2016—2017 Discipline development report of oil and gas storage and transportation engineering[M]. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, 2018: 1-3.
[17] 王桂芝，孙汉卿，王广亮.工程教育专业认证背景下教学评价及持续改进策略研究[J].河南牧业经济学院学报，2021，34（6）: 88-92. WANG G Z, SUN H Q, WANG G L. A study on teaching evaluation and continual improvement tactics under the background of engineering education professional certification[J]. Journal of Henan University of Animal Husbandry and Economy, 2021, 34(6): 88-92.
[18] 刘龙，申华，韩雪，鞠尔男，郭书杰.基于工程教育专业认证的毕业要求与课程目标达成评价方法研究[J].计算机教育， 2021（8）：175-180. LIU L, SHEN H, HAN X, JU E N, GUO S J. Research on the evaluation method of graduation requirements and course goal achievement based on engineering education professional certification[J]. Computer Education, 2021(8): 175-180.
备注/Memo
何利民，男，1962年生，教授，博士生导师，2002年博士毕业于西安交通大学动力工程及工程热物理专业，现主要从事安全、多相流及多相分离方向的研究工作。地址：山东省青岛市黄岛区长江西路66号中国石油大学（华东）储运与建筑工程学院， 266580。电话：13863908229。Email：helimin@upc.edu.cn
（收稿日期：2022-04-01；修回日期：2022-04-06；编辑：李在蓉）
更新日期/Last Update:
2022-06-25