Website Copyright © Editorial Office of Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation
Powered by:www.samsoncn.com 029-89381847;029-88222991
Research on mechanical response of buried steel pipelines under continuous collapse
Research on mechanical response of buried steel pipelines under continuous collapse
LIU Peng1; HUANG Weihe2; LI Yuxing1; SUN Mingyuan1; ZHANG Yu1; ZHANG Yan1
1. College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China)//Shandong Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation Safety; 2. PetroChina Planning & Engineering Institute
Formation collapse is one of the common geological hazards for the buried long-distance pipelines. In order to study the mechanical response law of the buried steel pipelines under continuous collapse, experiments and numerical simulations of buried steel pipelines under continuous collapse were carried out, the deformation and stress changes of the buried steel pipelines during continuous collapse were analyzed, and the theoretical calculation results of pipeline mechanics under the collapse geological hazards were checked. The research results show that, in the case of collapse in a small area, the deformation and stress of pipelines increase continuously with the collapse area enlarged, and the displacement and stress in the middle of the pipelines are maximized. When the collapse area is expanded to a certain extent, the soil collapses completely, the pipelines are suspended, the displacement of the pipeline is reduced, the stress of the pipe is released greatly, and the maximum stress position of the pipelines changes from the middle to the point near the collapse boundary of the pipelines. The calculation results of the pipeline stress under the collapse geological hazards are greater than the experimental and simulation values if the friction or cohesion are considered based on the gravity, which are of more guiding significance. Further, the reasearch results could provide effective guidance to pipeline protection. (19 Figures, 4 Tables, 25 References)
[1] Petroleum and Natural Gas Department of State Energy Administration, Institute of Resources and Environmental Policy, Development Research Center of the State Council, Strategic Research Center for Oil and Gas Resources, MNR. China natural gas development report (2020)[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2020: 3-5.
[2] ZHANG J. Mechanical behavior of oil and gas pipelines under typical geological disasters[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2016.
[3] LIANG Z. Some mechanical problems in petroleum engineering[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1999: 1-44.
[4] GAO H Y, FENG Q M. Response analysis for buried pipelines through settlement zonc[j]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1997, 17(1): 69-76.
[5] SHANG E J, YU Y N. Deformation and stress analysis of the buffed pipeline in formation collapse region[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science), 2009, 24(4): 46—49,57.
[6] WANG T T, YAN X Z, YANG X J. Force analysis of suspended pipeline in collapsible loess areas based on elastic-plastic foundation model[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2010, 34(4): 1 13-1 18.
[7] WANG X L, SHUAI J, ZHANG J Q. Mechanical response analysis of buried pipeline crossing mining subsidence area[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 201 1, 32(1 1): 3373-3378, 3386.
[8] LIU Q L. Calculating method and analysis of plane strain question of interaction between buried pipe and soil[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2007, 28(1): 83-88.
[9] ZHANG T Q, LI X, WU X G. Analysis of longitudinal mechanical properties for pipeline during foundation uneven settlement[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2003(7): 46-48.
[10] GUAN H P, YAO A L, XIE F H, ME H Q, FENG W. Calculation and statistical analysis of maximal axial stress at mining subsidence area[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(1 1): 100-103.
[11] LIU C G, SHI Y X. Numerical analysis of buried pipelines subjected to the settlement[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2008, 28(4): 178-183.
[12] JIN L, WANG S, DU X L. Buckling response analysis of buried pipelines subjected to the site soil settlement[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 201 1, 27(2): 142-147.
[13] LUO X P, LU S L, SHI J F, LI X, ZHENG J Y. Numerical simulation of strength failure of buried polyethylene pipe under foundation settlement[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2015, 48:144-152.
[14] WU Y, YOU X, ZHA S X. Mechanical behavior analysis of buried polyethylene pipe under land subsidence[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2020, 108: 104351.
[15] ZHANG J, LIANG Z, HAN C J. Numerical modeling of mechanical behavior for buried steel pipelines crossing subsidence strata[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(6): e0130459.
[16] FENG X, LI H Z, CHEN B Z, ZHAO L, ZHOU J. Numerical investigations into the failure mode of buried prestressed concrete cylinder pipes under differential settlement[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2020, 111: 104492.
[17] CHEN Z L. Experimental research and analysis of the pipeline deformation mechanism caused by subsoil settlement[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2013.
[18] ZHANG X. The experiment of deformation and internal force of soft pipeline caused by subsoil settlement[D]. Taiyuan: Taiyuan University of Technology, 2013.
[19] XU P. Study on the buried pipeline-soil interaction and its mechanical response by mining subsidence[D]. Xuzhou: China University of Mining and Technology, 2015.
[20] ZHOU M, DU Y J, WANG F, YOU Q, DONG D D. Physical modeling of mechanical responses of HDPE pipes and subsurface settlement caused by land subsidence[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(2): 253-262.
[21] ZHOU M, DU Y J, WANG F, YOU Q, DONG D D. Mechanical response of buried HDPE pipes subjected to localized land subsidence[j]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 36CS2): 4177-4187.
[22] DING N, LI H B, GU X J, ZHU Y K, WU Y. Study on the mechanical properties of the tensile layer of non-metallic intelligent coiled tubing[j]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2020, 48(1 1): 1 19-125.
[23] ZHANG G J, QI G Q, QI D T. Present conditions and prospcct for application of non-metallic and composite materials for oil pipeline[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology Forum, 2017, 36(2): 26-31, 37.
[24] LI X P, LI Y, WANG F X, CUI K X, ZHOU Y H. A review of nonmetallic composite pipes[J]. Technology Supervision in Petroleum Industry, 2017, 33(10): 1-4.
[25] LIU P, LI Y X, ZHANG Y, SUN M Y, ZHANG Y, ZHANG Y. Stress calculation of buried pipelines affected by typical geological hazards[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2021, 40(2): 157-165.
Received date: 29 May 2021. Revised date: 12 Jul. 2021. Edited by: ZHANG Teng
Foundation item: supported by the National Key Research and Development Program "Research on Risk Assessment Technology of Oil and Gas Pipelines and Storage and Transportation Facilities" (No.2016YFC0802104)
About the author: LIU Peng, male, born in 1995, is a doctoral student and was graduated from China University of Petroleum (East China), majoring in Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation Engineering in 2018. Currently, he is mainly engaged in the study on safety of natural gas pipelines. Address: No. 66, West Changjiang Road, Huangdao District, Qingdao, China, 266580. Tel: 17854227668. Email: b18060022@s.upc.edu.cn