Website Copyright © Editorial Office of Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation
Powered by:www.samsoncn.com 029-89381847;029-88222991
Fracture assessment method for girth welds of high-grade steel pipelines considering strength matching
Fracture assessment method for girth welds of high-grade steel pipelines considering strength matching
WU Kai1; ZHANG Hong1; YANG Yue1; LIU Xiaoben1; SUI Yongli2; CHEN Pengchao3
1. China University of Petroleum (Beijing) // National Engineering Laboratory for Pipeline Safety // MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering // Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Oil and Gas Distribution Technology; 2. China Petroleum Pipeline Research I
girth welds; high-grade; strength matching; Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD); fracture assessment
The actual strength under-matching of pipeline girth welds is a principal cause for the fracture failure of welds. The current Failure Assessment Diagram (FAD) method for the applicability assessment of pipeline welds cannot accurately consider the influence of weld strength matching. Thus, accurate inclusion of strength matching becomes critical to broaden the FAD method to apply to the crack defect assessment for the girth welds of high-grade steel pipelines. Based on the nonlinear finite element method, a numerical simulation model of the crack driving forces for the girth welds of high-grade steel pipelines was established, and the general failure assessment curve of girth weld cracks was plotted with the equivalent stress-strain relationship method. Then, a series of finite element assessment points under different load levels were determined with the finite element calculation results of the crack driving forces in combination with the recommended methods in Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures (BS 7910-2019). Further, the assessment accuracy of BS 7910- 2019 to the crack defects of girth welds was determined, and the critical causes affecting the accuracy of the assessment results were investigated. On this basis, the optimized ultimate load calculation model of the pipeline girth welds and the improved FAD method were put forward with the crack depth, the crack length and the weld strength matching coefficient considered, and the weld strength matching was accurately included into the FAD method. Thereby, the assessment accuracy of the girth weld crack defects of the high-grade steel pipelines was further enhanced. Generally, the method could provide reference for the applicability assessment of the girth weld cracks of in-service high-grade steel pipelines. (11 Figures, 24 References)
[1] KUMAR V, GERMAN M D, WILKENING W W, ANDREWS W R, DELORENZI H G, MOWBRAY D F. Advances in elastic- plastic fracture analysis: EPRI-NP-3607[R]. Schenectady: General Electric Co., 1984:12-21.
[2] KUMAR V, GERMAN M D. Elastic-plastic fracture analysis of through-wall and surface ?aws in cylinders: EPRI-NP-5596[R]. Schenectady: General Electric Co., 1988:1-7.
[3] AINSWORTH R A, BANNISTER A C, ZERBST U. An overview of the European flaw assessment procedure SINTAP and its validation[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2000, 77(14/15): 869-876.
[4] SUI Y L. Current situation and development trend of girth welding technology for oil and gas pipeline[J]. Electric Welding Machine, 2020, 50(9): 53-59.
[5] ZOU B, YANG F P, BAI H, WANG J. Method for assessing girth weld failure of X80 gas pipelines in service [J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2021, 40(8): 874-879, 887.
[6] SHAN K, SHUAI J, YANG G, MENG W, ZHANG H. Evaluation method for basic failure probability of oil and gas pipeline based on accident statistics in the United States and enlightenments[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2020,39(5):530-535.
[7] ZHANG Z Y. Key factors for safety improvement design of girth weld in high-grade large diameter natural gas pipelines[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2020,39(7):740-748.
[8] SHUAI J, WANG X, ZHANG Y H, WU X. Main characteristics and safety assessment of girth welds in high grade steel pipelines[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2020,39(6):623-631.
[9] ZHANG H, WU K, LIU X B, YANG Y, SUI Y L, ZHANG Z Y. Numerical simulation method for strain capacity of girth welding joint on X80 pipeline with 1 422 mm diameter[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2020, 39(2): 162-168.
[10] WU K, LIU X B, ZHANG H, SUI Y L, ZHANG Z Y, YANG D, et al. Fracture response of 1 422 mm diameter pipe with double-V groove weld joints and circumferential crack in fusion line[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2020, 115: 104641.
[11] YANG Y, ZHANG H, WU K, CHEN P C, SUI Y L, YANG D, et al. Strain capacity analysis of the mismatched welding joint with misalignments of OD 1 422 mm X80 steel pipelines: an experimental and numerical investigation[J]. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering, 2021, 1(2): 212-224.
[12] TKACZYK T, O'DOWD N P, NIKBIN K. Fracture assessment procedures for steel pipelines using a modified reference stress solution[J]. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2009, 131(3): 031409.
[13] KASTNER W, RÖHRICH E, SCHMITT W, STEINBUCH R. Critical crack sizes in ductile piping[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessel and Piping, 1981, 9(3): 197-219.
[14] KUMAR V, GERMAN M D, SHIH C F. Engineering approach for elastic-plastic fracture analysis: EPRI-NP-1931[R]. Schenectady: General Electric Co., 1981:15-20.
[15] LEI Y, AINSWORTH R A. A J integral estimation method for cracks in welds with mismatched mechanical properties[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 1997, 70(3): 237-245.
[16] LEI Y, AINSWORTH R A. Failure assessment diagrams for cracks in welds with mismatched mechanical properties[C]. Montreal: American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 1996: 65-73.
[17] WU K, ZHANG H, YANG Y, LIU X B. Numerical analysis of the crack driving force of mismatched girth welded pipes subject to large plastic deformations[C]. Virtual Online: American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, 2021: 61188.
[18] LEI Y, LI P, WAMG Z. A new J integral estimation method for defects in materials with non-Ramberg-Osgood stress-strain relationships: East China University of Science and Technology Report for Project 85-924-02-021[R]. Shanghai: East China University of Science and Technology, 1994: 9-17.
[19] KIM Y J, SHIM D J, NIKBIN K, KIM Y J, HWANG S S, KIM J S. Finite element based plastic limit loads for cylinders with part-through surface cracks under combined loading[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2003, 80(7/8): 527-540.
[20] KIM S H, HAN J J, KIM Y J. Limit load solutions of V-groove welded pipes with a circumferential crack at the centre of weld[J]. Procedia Materials Science, 2014, 3: 706-713.
[21] KIM J S, SONG T K, KIM Y J, JIN T E. Strength mis-match effect on limit loads for circumferential surface cracked pipes[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2009, 76(8): 1074-1086.
[22] AINSWORTH R A. The assessment of defects in structures of strain hardening material[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 1984, 19(4): 633-642.
[23] JIA P Y, JING H Y, XU L Y, HAN Y D, ZHAO L. A modi?ed fracture assessment method for pipelines under combined inner pressure and large-scale axial plastic strain[J]. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2017, 87: 91-98.
[24] KIM Y J, BUDDEN P J. Reference stress approximations for J and COD of circumferential through-wall cracked pipes[J]. International Journal of Fracture, 2002, 116(3): 195-218.
Received date: 30 Apr. 2021. Revised date: 11 Aug. 2021; Edited by: ZHANG Xueqin
Foundation item: supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, "Study on Buckling Evolution and Ductile Failure Mechanism of X80 Pipeline under Reverse Fault" (No.52004314) and Xinjiang Tianshan Youth Program "Ductile Fracture and Post-buckling Failure Behavior of High-grade Steel Pipelines under Complex Load" (No.2019Q088).
About the author: WU Kai, male, born in 1994, is a doctoral student. He graduated from China University of Petroleum (Beijing) with a master's degree in Safety Engineering in 2018. Now he is mainly engaged in the research on failure analysis and integrity management of oil and gas equipment. Address: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), No.18, Fuxue Road, Changping District, Beijing, 102249. Tel: 13691133698. Email: wk0609@126.com