PDF下载

[1]常景龙.受潮汐干扰管道分布调查及干扰影响规律[J].油气储运,2025,44(02):230-239.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2025.02.012]
　CHANG Jinglong.Investigation on the distribution of pipelines affected by tidal interference and research on the interference law[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2025,44(02):230-239.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2025.02.012]

点击复制

受潮汐干扰管道分布调查及干扰影响规律

《油气储运》[ISSN:1000-8241/CN:13-1093/TE] 卷: 44 期数: 2025年02期页码: 230-239 栏目: 运行与管理出版日期: 2025-02-25

Title:: Investigation on the distribution of pipelines affected by tidal interference and research on the interference law

文章编号:: 1000-8241（2025）02-0230-10

作者:: 常景龙; 国家石油天然气管网集团有限公司

Author(s):: CHANG Jinglong; China Oil & Gas Pipeline Network Corporation

关键词:: 埋地管道; 杂散电流干扰; 潮汐干扰; 管地电位; 数值模拟

Keywords:: buried pipelines; stray current interference; tidal interference; pipe-to-soil potential; numerical simulation

分类号:: TE988

DOI:: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2025.02.012

文献标志码:: A

摘要:: 【目的】潮汐干扰会给管道带来严重的腐蚀风险，明确受潮汐干扰管道分布与管道受潮汐干扰规律对中国油气管道事业至关重要。【方法】采用埋地试片法进行了24h电位监检测，通过试片的波形变化对潮汐干扰规律进行了分析，并利用傅里叶变换对电位监检测数据进行了频域分析。通过数值模拟计算研究了不同干扰电压、管道距干扰源间距、土壤电阻率等因素对管道受潮汐干扰的影响规律。【结果】中国受潮汐干扰管道主要集中在东部沿海区域，分布于江苏、福建、浙江、辽宁、山东共5个省份，干扰源主要为海洋与大型水体，潮汐干扰区域管道普遍叠加有地铁杂散电流干扰。干扰源对管道产生潮汐干扰影响时的最大间距为55km，干扰源距管道超过25km时，管道管地电位波动幅度显著减小。【结论】管道受到潮汐干扰时，管地电位变化曲线与附近大型水体潮汐涨落曲线趋势基本一致，呈“双峰双谷”波动特征，波动周期约为12h，频率为2.3×10?5Hz。与海岸线平行的管道受到潮汐干扰时，管道距离干扰源最近处为杂散电流流入时，远离管道两侧末端杂散电流流出；反之，当管道距离干扰源最近处为杂散电流流出时，远离管道两侧末端杂散电流流入。随着管道远离海岸线，管道受潮汐杂散电流强度呈指数下降。研究成果可为潮汐干扰下管道腐蚀风险评估与干扰防护提供理论依据与参考。（图15，表1，参24）

Abstract:: [Objective] Tidal interference can pose serious corrosion risks to pipelines, and it is crucial to clarify the distribution of pipelines affected by tidal interference and the laws governing their susceptibility to tidal interference for China’s oil and gas pipeline industry. [Methods] A 24-hour potential monitoring was conducted using the buried test piece method. Tidal interference patterns were analyzed through the waveform changes of the test piece, and frequency domain analysis of the potential monitoring data was performed using Fourier transform. The effects of various interference voltages, pipeline proximity to interference sources, soil resistivity, and other factors on tidal interference patterns were investigated through numerical simulation calculation. [Results] In China, pipelines affected by tidal interference are primarily concentrated in the eastern coastal region, specifically in Jiangsu, Fujian, Zhejiang, Liaoning, and Shandong. The main interference sources are oceans and large water bodies, with subway stray current interference typically superimposed on pipelines in areas experiencing tidal interference. This study found that the maximum distance at which an interference source can affect a pipeline through tidal interference was 55 km. Beyond 25 km, the fluctuation amplitude of the pipe-to-soil potential decreased significantly. [Conclusion] When the pipeline is affected by tides, the variation curve of pipe-to-soil potential closely follows the tiding trends of nearby large water bodies, exhibiting a “ double peaks and double valleys” fluctuation pattern with a period of approximately 12 hours and a frequency of 2.3×10?5 Hz. For a pipeline parallel to the coastline and affected by tides, the point nearest to the interference source experiences incoming stray current, while both ends farthest from such source experience outgoing stray current, and vice versa. As the pipeline moves away from the coastline, the intensity of tidal stray current on the pipeline decreases exponentially. The research results provide a theoretical basis and reference for assessing pipeline corrosion risk under tidal interference and for developing interference prevention strategies. (15 Figures, 1 Table, 24 References)

参考文献/References:

[1] 朱祥剑，杜艳霞，覃慧敏，张熠，葛彩刚. 地铁杂散电流干扰下埋地管道管地电位动态波动规律[J]. 腐蚀与防护，2019，40（12）：878-885. 10.11973/fsyfh-201912003. ZHU X J, DU Y X, QIN H M, ZHANG Y, GE C G. Dynamic fluctuation characteristics of pipe-to-soil potential on buried pipelines under interference of stray current from subway[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2019, 40(12): 878-885.
[2] 李敏锋，吴广春，陈玉亮，赵万里，濮春明，张梦梦. 苏州地区管道受地铁杂散电流干扰的规律[J]. 腐蚀与防护，2023，44（8）：83-88，116. 10.11973/fsyfh-202308015. LI M F, WU G C, CHEN Y L, ZHAO W L, PU C M, ZHANG M M. Metro stray current interference regularity of buried pipeline in Suzhou area[J]. Corrosion and Protection, 2023, 44(8):83-88, 116.
[3] 张梦梦，徐友鹏，胡贵斌，冯德佳，吴广春，杜雪麟，等. 管道地铁杂散电流干扰腐蚀风险评估与防护措施[J]. 腐蚀与防护，2023，44（6）：82-89. 10.11973/fsyfh-202306013. ZHANG M M, XU Y P, HU G B, FENG D J, WU G C, DU X L, et al. Corrosin Risk Evaluation and Proteetion Measures of Pipeline Interfered by Metro Stray Current[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2023, 44(6): 82-89.
[4] 陈乐，杜艳霞，梁毅. 高速铁路交流干扰下埋地管道交直流参数动态波动特征[J]. 腐蚀与防护，2023，44（5）：69-77. 10.11973/fsyfh-202305013. CHEN L, DU Y X, LIANG Y. Dynamic fluctuation characteristics of AC and DC parameters of buried pipeline under AC interference from high-speed railway[J]. Corrosion & Protection, 2023, 44(5):69-77.
[5] 吴广春，李德明. 交流输电线路单相接地故障时埋地管道安全距离确定及其影响因素研究[J]. 材料保护，2022，55（增刊 1）：27-33. 10.16577/j.issn.1001-1560.2022.1005. WU G C, LI D M. Research on the determination of safe distance of buried pipeline and its influencing factors in case of single-phase grounding fault of AC transmission line[J]. Materials Protection, 2022, 55(S1): 27-33.
[6] 闫茂成，石薇，王彬彬. 埋地阴极保护管线的交流干扰腐蚀[J].装备环境工程，2021，18（4）：1-8. 10.7643/issn.1672-9242.2021.04.001. YAN M C, SHI W, WANG B B. Research on AC interference corrosion of buried pipeline with cathodic protection[J]. Equipment Environmental Engineering, 2021, 18(4): 1-8.
[7] 胡亚博，吴志平，吴世勤，倪少清，常景龙. 高压直流接地极对埋地管道腐蚀的影响和管控思考[J]. 油气储运，2021，40（3）：256-262. 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.03.003. HU Y B, WU Z P, WU S Q, NI S Q, CHANG J L. Influence of HVDC grounding electrode on corrosion of buried pipelines and thought on risk management and control[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2021, 40(3): 256-262.
[8] 顾清林，姜永涛，曹国飞，葛彩钢，丁疆强，高荣钊，等. 高压直流接地极对埋地管道的干扰监测及影响规律[J]. 油气储运，2021，40（1）：26-32. 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.01.005. GU Q L, JIANG Y T, CAO G F, GE C G, DING J Q, GAO R Z, et al. Interference monitoring and influence rule of HVDC grounding electrode to buried pipelines[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2021, 40(1): 26-32.
[9] 翟维枫，梁志珊，左信，毕武喜，蓝卫. 地磁暴引起的埋地管道管地电位“波节”和“纠缠”分布特征[J]. 石油学报，2020，41（8）：1001-1010. 10.7623/syxb202008009. ZHAI W F, LIANG Z S, ZUO X, BI W X, LAN W. Distribution characteristics of wave joint and entanglement of pipe-to-soil potential on buried pipeline and induced by geomagnetic storm, 2020, 41(8): 1001-1010.
[10] 刘连光，张鹏飞，王开让，毕武喜，葛艾天. 地磁暴侵害油气管道的管地电位效应[J]. 电工技术学报，2016，31（9）：68-74. 10.19595/j.cnki.1000-6753.tces.2016.09.009. LIU L G, ZHANG P F, WANG K R, BI W X, GE A T. PSP interference effect of geomagnetic storm on buried pipelines[J]. Transaction of China Electrotechnical Society, 2016, 31(9):68-74.
[11] 梁志珊，王鹏，胡黎花，张举丘. 埋地油气管道地磁感应电流（GIC）的混沌特性研究[J]. 物理学报，2014，63（17）：96-104. 10.7498/aps.63.170505. LIANG Z S, WANG P, HU L H, ZHANG J Q. Chaotic characteristic study of GIC in buried steel oil pipeline[J]. Acta Phys. Sin., 2014, 63(17): 96-104.
[12] 张鹏飞，刘连光，马成廉. 油气管网与电网的地磁暴干扰机理比较研究[J]. 科学技术与工程，2015，15（25）：48-54，87. 10. 3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2015.25.009. ZHNAG P F, LIU L G, MA C L. Comparison of geomagnetic storm interference in pipelines and power system[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2015, 15(25): 48-54, 87.
[13] 王军，吴昀，张响，杜艳霞，朱敏，李自力. 直流杂散电流对埋地管道腐蚀规律及干扰影响的研究进展[J]. 材料保护，2023，56（4）：169-177，182. 10.16577/j.issn.1001-1560.2023.0098. WANG J, WU Y, ZHANG X, DU Y X, ZHU M, LI Z L. Research progresses on the corrosion law and interference effect of DC stray current on buried pipelines[J]. Materials Protection, 2023, 56(4): 169-177, 182.
[14] 吴广春，李德明，张梦梦. 交流电对X80钢腐蚀行为影响研究[J]. 表面技术，2022，51（6）：307-316. 10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2022.06.029. WU G C, LI D M, ZHANG M M. Alternating current on corrosion behavior of X80 steel[J]. Surface Technology, 2022, 51(6):307-316.
[15] WANG C, LI W, WANG Y. A probabilistic-based model for dynamic predicting pitting corrosion rate of pipeline under stray current interference[J]. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering, 2021, 1(3): 339-348. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpse.2021.09.003.
[16] 吴长访，钟婷，冯永强，石胜明，闫茂成，刘文会，等. 脉冲阴极保护下剥离防腐层管道的极化行为[J]. 油气储运，2024，43（6）：649-655. 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.06.006. WU C F, ZHONG T, FENG Y Q, SHI S M, YAN M C, LIU W H, et al. Polarization behavior of pipelines with peeled anti-corrosive coating under pulsed current cathodic protection[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2024, 43(6): 649-655.
[17] 赵耀峰.埋地油气管道GIC-PSP监测原理与装置研制[D].北京：中国石油大学（北京），2016. ZHAO Y F. T The GIC-PSP of buried oil and gas pipeline monitoring theory and device designed[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2016.
[18] 熊树海. 潮汐感应和地磁海岸效应对沿海埋地管线腐蚀机理的研究[D]. 中国石油大学（北京），2017. XIONG S H. Study on corrosion mechanism and algorithm of coastal pipeline by coastal effect and tide induction[D]. China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2017 .
[19] 方莉. 管道管地电位（PSP）潮汐效应机理研究[D]. 中国石油大学（北京），2019. FANG L. Study on tidal effect mechanism of buried pipeline pipe-soil potential (PSP)[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2019
[20] LIU L G, YU Z B, WANG X, LIU W L. The effect oftidal geoelectric fields on GIC and PSP in buried pipelines[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7(99): 87469-87478. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2920944.
[21] 廖文举，杜翠薇，刘智勇，李晓刚. 管线钢在青岛滨海潮汐环境中的腐蚀行为[C]. 北京：2015第二届海洋材料与腐蚀防护大会，2015：14-18. LIAO W J, DU C W, LIU Z Y, LI X G. Corrosion behavior of X65 steel in Qingdao coastal tidal environment[C]. Beijing:Complete Collection of Papers at the Second 2015 Ocean Materials and Corrosion Protection Conference, 2015: 14-18.
[22] 谭大诚，王兰炜，赵家骝，席继楼，刘大鹏，于华，等. 潮汐地电场谐波和各向波形的影响要素[J]. 地球物理学报，2011，54（7）：1842-1853. 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2011.07.018. TAN D C, WANG L W, ZHAO J L, XI J L, LIU D P, YU H, et al. Influence factors of harmonic waves and directional waveforms of tidal geoelectrical field[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2011, 54(7): 1842-1853.
[23] LONGUET-HIGGINS M S. The electrical and magnetic effects of tidal streams[J]. Geophysical Supplements to the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1949, 5(8): 285-307. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-246X.1949.tb02945.x.
[24] 谭大诚，赵家骝，席继楼，杜学彬，徐建明. 潮汐地电场特征及机理研究[J]. 地球物理学报，2010，53（3）：544-555. 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2010.03.008. TAN D C, ZHAO J L, XI J L, DU X B, XU J M. A study on feature and mechanism of the tidal geoelectrical field[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2010, 53(3): 544-555.

相似文献/References:

[1]周祥.埋地钢质管道外涂层缺陷的安全质量分级评价[J].油气储运,2011,30(04):299.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.04.017]
　Zhou Xiang.Safety quality grading evaluation on the external coating defects of buried steel pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(02):299.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.04.017]
[2]付吉强,吴明,杜明俊,等.埋地管道周围土壤湿热耦合相变过程的数值计算[J].油气储运,2011,30(01):30.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.01.008]
　Fu Jiqiang,Wu Ming,Du Mingjun,et al.Numerical calculation on heat-moisture coupling and phase change process of the soil around buried pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(02):30.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.01.008]
[3]陈杨,王为民,陈伟聪,等.基于故障树与模糊理论的埋地管道风险评价[J].油气储运,2011,30(07):481.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.07.001]
　Chen Yang,Wang Weimin,Chen Weicong,et al.Risk assessment of the buried pipeline based on the fault tree and fuzzy theory[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(02):481.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.07.001]
[4]胡士信,陆家榆,张本革,等.邻近强电线路管道交流干扰参数的测试方法[J].油气储运,2011,30(03):203.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.03.012]
　Hu Shixin,Lu Jiayu,Zhang Benge,et al.Test method of AC interference parameters for pipeline adjacent power transmission lines[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(02):203.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.03.012]
[5]李朝阳,马贵阳,刘亮.埋地输油管道泄漏油品扩散模拟[J].油气储运,2011,30(09):674.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.09.008]
　Li Zhaoyang,Ma Guiyang,Liu Liang,et al.Diffusion simulation on leaked oil for buried pipelines[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(02):674.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.09.008]
[6]王鸿膺,蒋涛,秦晓霞,等.川气东送管道土壤腐蚀埋片试验[J].油气储运,2010,29(10):769.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2010.10.013]
　Wang Hongying,Jiang Tao,Qin Xiaoxia.Field Coupon Testing on the Soil Corrosivity of Sichuan-East Gas Pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2010,29(02):769.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2010.10.013]
[7]薛致远,张丰,毕武喜,等.东北管网阴极保护通电/断电电位测量与分析[J].油气储运,2010,29(10):772.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2010.10.014]
　Xue Zhiyuan,Zhang Feng,Bi Wuxi.The Measurement and Analysis of On/Off-potential in Northeast Oil Pipeline Networks[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2010,29(02):772.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2010.10.014]
[8]刘仕鳌蒲红宇刘书文蒋洪.埋地管道应力分析方法[J].油气储运,2012,31(4):274.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.04.009]
　Liu Shiao,Pu Hongyu,Liu Shuwen,et al.Stress analysis method of buried pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2012,31(02):274.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.04.009]
[9]吴峰,李向阳,张治军.埋地参数对管道同沟敷设传热的影响[J].油气储运,2010,29(11):835.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2010.11.009]
　Wu Feng,Li Xiangyang,Zhang Zhijun.Influence of Buried Parameters for Heat Transfer of Pipelines Laid in One Ditch[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2010,29(02):835.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2010.11.009]
[10]赵雄,周卫军,郭瑞.SPAE评价法在管道防腐层性能评价中的应用[J].油气储运,2009,28(11):54.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2009.11.015]
　ZHAO Xiong,ZHOU Weijun.Application of SPAE Method in Coating Performance Evaluation of Pipelines[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2009,28(02):54.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2009.11.015]
[11]常景龙.受潮汐干扰管道分布调查及干扰影响规律[J].油气储运,2025,44(01):1.
　Chang Jinglong.Investigation on pipeline distribution affected by tidal interference and analysis of interference patterns[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2025,44(02):1.

备注/Memo

常景龙，男，1971年生，高级工程师，1995年毕业于内蒙古大学化学专业，现主要从事管道防腐技术方向的研究工作。地址：北京市朝阳区东土城路5号城科大厦518室，100013。电话：010-87981893。Email：changjl@pipechina.com.cn
基金项目：国家管网集团科学技术研究总院分公司自立课题“杂散电流排流设施效能评价及寿命评估技术研究”，ZJGS-AQWH202403-YJZY-001。
● Received: 2024-01-27● Revised: 2024-04-11● Online: 2024-11-01

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-02-25