PDF下载

[1]田望,陈心怡,任磊,等.油气储运企业甲烷排放管理体系框架构建[J].油气储运,2025,44(03):1-12.
　TIAN Wang,CHEN Xinyi,REN Lei,et al.Construction of methane emission management system framework for oil & gas storage and transportation companies[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2025,44(03):1-12.

点击复制

油气储运企业甲烷排放管理体系框架构建

《油气储运》[ISSN:1000-8241/CN:13-1093/TE] 卷: 44 期数: 2025年03期页码: 1-12 栏目: 出版日期: 2025-03-25

Title:: Construction of methane emission management system framework for oil & gas storage and transportation companies

作者:: 田望; 陈心怡; 任磊; 王传风; 茹畅; 李晓枫; 国家管网集团科学技术研究总院分公司

Author(s):: TIAN Wang; CHEN Xinyi; REN Lei; WANG Chuanfeng; RU Chang; LI Xiaofeng; PipeChina Institute of Science and Technology

关键词:: 油气储运; 甲烷排放; 管理体系; 控排目标; 量化减排

Keywords:: oil &; gas storage and transportation; methane emission; management system; ; emission control targets; quantified emission reduction

分类号:: TE832

文献标志码:: A

摘要:: 【目的】油气储运企业将油气产业链的上游和下游串联起来，是甲烷减排工作开展的主力军，然而当前其甲烷排放管理体系尚不健全。为此，研究油气储运企业甲烷排放管理体系框架，有助于进一步细化企业甲烷排放管控工作，贯彻落实《甲烷排放控制行动方案》，助力实现“双碳”目标。【方法】从欧盟、美国以及中国油气行业的甲烷管控趋势出发，梳理欧美在政策导向、排放标准、企业责任、减排技术等方面的发展要求，分析油气储运企业进行甲烷排放管理的必要性。同时，选取8家北美、欧洲知名油气公司进行文件报告调研，从顶层设计、量化统计、检测维修、信息披露4个方面对比其甲烷排放管理经验，总结了油气公司在体系顶层设计和管理细则方面的甲烷排放管理思路。【结果】国际油气企业在法规的强制要求及油气行业组织的指导下，已逐步建立完善甲烷排放管理体系，形成明确的减排目标、组织架构和考核激励机制，未来工作重心放在排放监测量化方面；对比国际，中国油气储运企业甲烷排放管理体系尚不成熟，甲烷控排工作缺少抓手，跨部门协作与激励机制不完善，减排主动性不足。【结论】中国油气储运企业应参照国际甲烷排放管理体系的领先经验与优秀实践，从甲烷排放管理的顶层设计出发，以控排目标为导向，围绕量化统计、规划减排、评价审核、信息公开等过程环节压实责任分工，健全考核奖励机制，搭建油气储运企业甲烷排放管理体系框架；编制运营过程中的排放量化方法，规范维检修工作流程，明确环境信息披露要求，充分考虑甲烷减排成本与效益，完善碳资产管理能力，从而实现甲烷管理与企业生产、安全、成本等管理协同发展。（表4，参43）

Abstract:: [Objective] Oil & gas storage and transportation companies play a crucial role in methane emission reduction by linking the upstream and downstream segments of the industry. However, their methane emission management systems remain inadequate. Therefore, studying the methane emission management system framework for oil & gas storage and transportation companies will enhance the precision of their emission control efforts, facilitate the implementation of the Methane Emissions Control Action Plan, and support the achievement of “dual carbon” goals. [Methods] The trends in methane control within the oil and gas industries of the EU, the United States, and China were reviewed, the development requirements of the EU and the United States regarding policy orientation, emission standards, corporate responsibility, emission reduction technology were examined, and the necessity of methane emission management for oil & gas storage and transportation companies was analyzed. Additionally, a document report investigation was conducted on eight prominent oil and gas companies in North America and Europe. Their methane emission management experience was compared across four aspects: top-level design, quantitative statistics, inspection and maintenance, and information disclosure. Key insights into their system design and management rules were also summarized. [Results] Under the mandatory requirements of laws and regulations and the guidance of oil and gas industry organizations, international oil and gas companies have gradually established and enhanced methane emission management systems, setting clear emission reduction targets, organizational structures, and assessment incentive mechanisms. Future efforts will focus on quantifying emission monitoring. In contrast, the methane emission management system for oil & gas storage and transportation companies in China remains underdeveloped, lacking effective control measures, robust cross-departmental cooperation, and sufficient incentives for emission reduction. [Conclusion] Oil & gas storage and transportation companies in China should adopt best practices from leading international methane emission management systems. They should focus on top-level design, using emission control targets as guidance, and clearly define responsibilities across quantitative statistics, planning, emission reduction, evaluation, review, and information disclosure processes. Enhancing the assessment and reward mechanisms is essential for building a robust methane emission management framework. Additionally, the companies should develop emission quantification methods, standardize maintenance workflows, clarify environmental information disclosure requirements, consider the cost-benefit of methane emission reduction, and improve carbon asset management capabilities to achieve coordinated development of methane management with production, safety, and cost management. (4 Tables, 43 References)

相似文献/References:

[1]关中原.我国油气储运相关技术研究新进展[J].油气储运,2012,31(1):1.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.01.001]
　Guan Zhongyuan.New progress in relevant technology research of oil & gas storage and transportation in China[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2012,31(03):1.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.01.001]
[2]梅云新.未来我国油气储运的科技问题[J].油气储运,2005,24(6):4.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2005.06.002]
　MEI Yunxin.The Science and Technology Issues on Future Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation in China[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2005,24(03):4.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2005.06.002]
[3]潘家华.全面提高我国油气储运事业的整体水平[J].油气储运,2004,23(5):1.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2004.05.001]
　PAN Jiahua.To Improve overall Technology Level of China’s Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation Industry in an All-round Way[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2004,23(03):1.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2004.05.001]
[4]李宁.我国海洋石油油气储运回顾与展望[J].油气储运,2003,22(9):30.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2003.09.008]
　LI Ning.Oil and Gas Storage and Transportation in China’s Offshore Oilfields: Review and Forecast[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2003,22(03):30.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2003.09.008]
[5]严大凡.油气储运专业回顾与展望[J].油气储运,2003,22(9):1.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2003.09.001]
　YAN Dafan.A Half Century’s Development in the Subject of Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation of University of Petroleum: Review and Prospect[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2003,22(03):1.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2003.09.001]
[6]严大凡.油气储运专业建业一甲子回溯[J].油气储运,2012,31(6):401.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.06.001]
　Yan Dafan. The establishment of oil & gas storage and transportation specialty in China—sixty-year backtracking[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2012,31(03):401.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.06.001]
[7]黄维和.我国油气储运技术的发展[J].油气储运,2012,31(6):411.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.06.003]
　Huang Weihe.The development of oil & gas storage and transportation technology in China[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2012,31(03):411.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.06.003]
[8]姚伟.我国油气储运标准化现状与发展对策[J].油气储运,2012,31(6):416.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.06.004]
　Yao Wei. The current situation and development of standardization in oil & gas storage and transportation industry in China[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2012,31(03):416.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.06.004]
[9]钱建华.论油气储运设施安全的重要性[J].油气储运,2012,31(6):422.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.06.005]
　Qian Jianhua. On the importance of safety of oil & gas storage and transportation facilities[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2012,31(03):422.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.06.005]
[10]余冷媚　吴灿奇　郑云萍　浦宏斌　汪玉春. 综合评价方法在油气储运工程中的应用现状[J].油气储运,2012,31(9):652.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.09.003]
　Yu Lengmei,Wu Canqi,Zheng Yunping,et al.Application situation of comprehensive evaluation method in oil & gas storage and transportation engineering[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2012,31(03):652.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.09.003]

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-02-10