PDF下载
[1]刁宇,李秋娟,刘朝阳,等.油气管道安全仪表系统检验测试方法[J].油气储运,2024,43(08):944-951.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.08.011]
　DIAO Yu,LI Qiujuan,LIU Zhaoyang,et al.Inspection and testing methodology for safety instrumented system of oil and gas pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2024,43(08):944-951.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.08.011]
点击复制

油气管道安全仪表系统检验测试方法

《油气储运》[ISSN:1000-8241/CN:13-1093/TE] 卷: 43 期数: 2024年08期 页码: 944-951 栏目: 运行与管理 出版日期: 2024-08-25
Title:
Inspection and testing methodology for safety instrumented system of oil and gas pipeline
文章编号:
1000-8241（2024）08-0944-08
作者:
刁宇1; 李秋娟1; 刘朝阳1; 于子峰2; 张冯银3; 李东阳1; 黄衫3; 陶冶3
1.国家管网集团科学技术研究总院分公司;2.国家石油天然气管网集团有限公司;3.国家管网集团北方管道有限责任公司
Author(s):
DIAO Yu1; LI Qiujuan1; LIU Zhaoyang1; YU Zifeng2; ZHANG Fengyin3; LI Dongyang1; HUANG Shan3; TAO Ye3
1.PipeChina Institute of Science and Technology;2.China Oil and Gas Pipeline Network Corporation;3.PipeChina North Pipeline Co. Ltd.
关键词:
安全仪表系统; 功能安全; 检验测试; 安全完整性
Keywords:
Safety Instrumented System (SIS);  functional safety;  inspection and testing;  safety integrity
分类号:
TE88
DOI:
10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.08.011
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【目的】智慧管网、无人值守站场的持续建设和快速发展对油气管道站场的安全性、可靠性等提出了更高的要求，安全仪表系统（SafetyInstrumentedSystem,SIS）是确保油气管道安全、可靠运行的重要环节。对SIS进行检验测试是确保安全仪表系统满足设计安全完整性等级的关键，而当前中国尚无有效的技术手段支撑SIS开展检验测试。【方法】调研国内外SIS检验测试技术现状，梳理国内外SIS相关标准规范并结合现场工程实践，提出油气管道行业安全仪表系统检验测试方法，建立包括站场信息采集、故障模式识别、故障覆盖率评价、失效概率计算及安全完整性等级验证方面的SIS检验测试技术体系，明确了SIS检验测试的要求、内容及方法。【结果】通过开展现场SIS检验测试，能够有效识别SIS潜在的硬件故障、SIS错误配置与操作问题、SIS运行过程中存在的管理问题3大类功能安全风险项；提出检验测试覆盖率的简化计算方法，结合检验测试故障覆盖率、检验测试周期等参数可有效验证SIS的安全完整性等级是否满足设计要求，评估站场SIS能否持续提供足够的降险能力。【结论】油气管道现场SIS检验测试方法能够有效指导油气管道行业及其他行业开展SIS检验测试工作，可为提升油气站场SIS运行维护能力和管道企业的风险管控能力提供借鉴与支持。（图2，表3，参18）
Abstract:
[Objective] The flourishing construction and rapid development of smart pipeline networks and unattended stations have elevated the requirements for oil and gas pipelines and stations, particularly in terms of safety and reliability. The Safety Instrumented System (SIS) is recognized as a crucial element in ensuring the safety and reliability of oil and gas pipelines. Furthermore, inspection and testing are acknowledged as pivotal to guarantee that SIS operates at the design safety integrity level. However, there exists a lack of effective technical means to support SIS inspection and testing in China. [Methods] After investigating the current status of SIS inspection and testing techniques in China and abroad, and reviewing pertinent Chinese and foreign SIS standards and specifications, an SIS inspection and testing methodology was proposed for the oil and gas pipeline sector, considering field engineering practices. Additionally, an SIS inspection and testing technology system was developed, encompassing information acquisition at stations, identification of fault modes, evaluation of fault coverage, calculations of failure probabilities, and validation of safety integrity levels. This system aims to elucidate the requirements, items, and methods of SIS inspection and testing. [Results] The proposed methodology effectively identified three categories of functional safety risk items during on-site SIS inspection and testing: potential SIS hardware faults, misconfigurations and operational defects within the SIS, and management flaws present in the SIS operation process. The simplified calculation method introduced for inspection and testing coverage successfully verified the safety integrity level of the SIS in alignment with design requirements, considering parameters like fault coverages and cycles of the inspection and testing. These verification results were leveraged as the basis for assessing the station SIS’s sustained and adequate capacity for risk reduction. [Conclusion] The proposed on-site SIS inspection and testing approach for oil and gas pipelines offers a valuable guide not only for the oil and gas pipeline sector but also for other industries in SIS inspection and testing. The research findings offer a reference and support to enhance the operational and maintenance capabilities of SIS at oil and gas stations, as well as to strengthen the risk management and control capabilities of pipeline enterprises. (2 Figures, 3 Tables, 18 References)

参考文献/References:

[1] 董红军.长输管道网格化管理实现基础与实施设想[J].油气储运，2020，39（6）：601-611. 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2020.06. 001.DONG H J. Realization foundation and implementation assumption of grid management for long-distance pipeline[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2020, 39(6): 601-611.
[2] 鲁青龙，王舰，柳晓萌，张哲，杨渠.关于长输油气管道推行区域化管理的深入思考[J].石油组织人事，2020（5）：74-77. LU Q L, WANG J, LIU X M, ZHANG Z, YANG Q. Deep reflection on promoting regional management of long oil and gas pipelines[J]. Petroleum Human Resources, 2020(5): 74-77.
[3] 艾月乔，贾立东，王禹钦，陈瑞波.输油气站场区域化管理创新与实践[J].石油科技论坛，2018，37（2）：23-27. 10.3969/j.issn.1002-302x.2018.02.006. AI Y Q, JIA L D, WANG Y Q, CHEN R B. Innovation and practice in regional construction and management of oil and gas gathering and transferring stations[J]. Petroleum Science and Technology Forum, 2018, 37(2): 23-27.
[4] 刁宇，刘朝阳，孙勇，李秋娟，游泽彬，马宁. LOPA分析方法在中俄东线压气站的应用与思考[J].油气储运，2021，40（12）：1416-1422. 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.12.013. DIAO Y, LIU Z Y, SUN Y, LI Q J, YOU Z B, MA N. Application of LOPA analysis method in compressor stations of China-Russia Eastern Gas Pipeline and consideration[J]. Oil &Gas Storage and Transportation, 2021, 40(12): 1416-1422.
[5] 张建国.浅议SIS的安全完整性管理[J].石油化工自动化， 2021，57（2）：1-7. 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7324.2021.02.001. ZHANG J G. Brief discussion on safety integrity management of SIS[J]. Automation in Petro-Chemical Industry, 2021, 57(2):1-7.
[6] 李胜利，吴强，仇广金. 安全仪表系统测试维护的设计探讨[J].石油化工自动化，2019，55（4）：49-52. 10.3969/j.issn. 1007-7324.2019.04.012. LI S L, WU Q, QIU G J. Discussion on design of safety instrument system test and maintenance[J]. Automation in Petro-Chemical Industry, 2019, 55(4): 49-52.
[7] 吕勃蓬，何凯云，钟利军，胡子秋，艾纯喜，夏庆春，等.输气站场仪表管道泄漏自动截断阀的研制[J].油气储运，2021，40（8）：919-924. 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.08.013. LYU B P, HE K Y, ZHONG L J, HU Z Q, AI C X, XIA Q C, et al. Development of automatic shut-off valve for leakage of instrumentpipe in gas transmission stations [J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2021, 40(8): 919-924.
[8] 朱杰，张则立，俞文光，金佳，吴少国.安全仪表系统检验测试程序完整性研究[J].自动化仪表，2023，44（5）：14-19. 10.16086/j.cnki.issn1000-0380.2022120057. ZHU J, ZHANG Z L, YU W G, JIN J, WU S G. Safety instrumented system inspection test program integrity study[J]. Process Automation Instrumentation, 2023, 44(5): 14-19.
[9] 史威，熊文泽.第四十七讲：过程工业安全仪表系统离线检验测试浅析[J].仪器仪表标准化与计量，2015（3）：20-23. 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5611.2015.03.008. SHI W, XIONG W Z. Chapter 47: analysis of off-line proof test in safety instrumented system for process sector[J]. Instrument Standardization and Metrology, 2015(3): 20-23.
[10] 耿秀丽，褚学宁.基于故障因果链的故障模式与影响分析风险评估方法[J].计算机集成制造系统，2009，15（12）：2473-2480. 10.13196/j.cims.2009.12.187.gengxl.029. GENG X L, CHU X N. Risk evaluation method in failure mode and effects analysis based on failure cause-effect chain[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2009, 15(12):2473-2480.
[11] 庞欣然，朱杰，宋晓鹏，刘黎，朱玉程.一种检验测试覆盖率的定义方法及其马尔可夫验证[J].石油化工自动化，2023， 59（1）：13-18. 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7324.2023.01.003. PANG X R, ZHU J, SONG X P, LIU L, ZHU Y C. A definition method of proof test coverage rate and its Markov verification[J]. Automation in Petro-Chemical Industry, 2023, 59(1): 13-18.
[12] 王璐，刘晓亮，熊文泽.基于检验测试覆盖率的冗余结构系统PFD计算探讨[J].劳动保护，2021（10）：98-101. 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4335.2021.10.043. WANG L, LIU X L, XIONG W Z. Discussion on PFD calculation of redundant structural systems based on verification and testing coverage[J]. Labour Protection, 2021(10): 98-101.
[13] 朱建新，王莉君，高增梁. IEC61511标准及在石化行业安全管理中的应用[J].中国安全科学学报，2007，17（2）：105-109. 10.3969/j.issn.1003-3033.2007.02.019. ZHU J X, WANG L J, GAO Z L. IEC61511 standard and its application in safety management of petrochemical industry[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2007, 17(2): 105-109.
[14] 张哲，王璐，徐长峰，赵国军，陈月娥，刘晓亮.基于检验测试策略的PFD模型建立与分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2021， 17（2）：128-134. 10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2021.02.020. ZHANG Z, WANG L, XU C F, ZHAO G J, CHEN Y E, LIU X L. Establishment and analysis of PFD model based on proof test strategy[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2021, 17(2): 128-134.
[15] 史建锋.安全仪表系统（SIS）安全完整性等级（SIL）评估验证必要性[J].中国氯碱，2019（5）：37-38. 10.3969/j.issn. 1009-1785.2019.05.011. SHI J F. Necessity of safety instrument system (SIS) safety integrity level (SIL) assessment and verification[J]. China Chlor-Alkali, 2019(5): 37-38.
[16] 杨艺.输气站场控制系统SIL分析与应用研究[D].成都：西南石油大学，2015. YANG Y. SIL analysis and application research of gas transmission station control system[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2015.
[17] 王俊，丁兰蓉.安全完整性等级SIL的验证方法[J].化工与医药工程，2015，36（2）：53-57. 10.3969/j.issn.1008-455X. 2015.02.016. WANG J, DING L R. Method of safety integrity level validation[J]. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Engineering, 2015, 36(2): 53-57.
[18] 李娜，孙文勇，宁信道. HAZOP、LOPA和SIL方法的应用分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2012，8（5）：101-106. 10.3969/j.issn.1673-193X.2012.05.019. LI N, SUN W Y, NING X D. The application of HAZOP, LOPA and SIL analytical method[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012, 8(5): 101-106.

相似文献/References:

[1]刁宇,刘朝阳,孙勇,等.LOPA分析方法在中俄东线压气站的应用与思考[J].油气储运,2021,40(12):1416.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.12.013]
　DIAO Yu,LIU Zhaoyang,SUN Yong,et al.Application of LOPA analysis method in compressor stations of China-Russia Eastern Gas Pipeline and consideration[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2021,40(08):1416.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.12.013]
[2]刁宇,李秋娟,刘朝阳,等.油气管道安全仪表系统检验测试方法[J].油气储运,2024,43(07):1.
　Yu Diao,Qiujuan Li,Zhaoyang Liu,et al.Oil and gas pipeline safety instrument system inspection test method[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2024,43(08):1.

备注/Memo

基金项目：国家重点研发计划“跨地域复杂油气管网安全高效运行状态监测传感系统及应用”，2022YFB3207600。
作者简介：刁宇，男，1988年生，高级工程师，2014年硕士毕业于东北石油大学油气储运工程专业，现主要从事油气管道智能决策与控制、功能安全方向的研究工作。地址：河北省廊坊市广阳区金光道51号，065000。电话：0316-2073305。Email：diaoyu@pipechina. com.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-08-20