PDF下载

[1]刘翠伟,洪伟民,王多才,等.地下储氢技术研究进展[J].油气储运,2023,42(08):841-855.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2023.08.001]
　LIU Cuiwei,HONG Weimin,WANG Duocai,et al.Research progress of underground hydrogen storage technology[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2023,42(08):841-855.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2023.08.001]

点击复制

地下储氢技术研究进展

《油气储运》[ISSN:1000-8241/CN:13-1093/TE] 卷: 42 期数: 2023年08期页码: 841-855 栏目: 前沿与综述出版日期: 2023-08-25

Title:: Research progress of underground hydrogen storage technology

文章编号:: 1000-8241（2023）08-0841-15

作者:: 刘翠伟¹; 洪伟民¹; 王多才²; 支树洁²; 张睿¹; 段瑶¹; 敬筱涵¹; 李玉星¹; 1.中国石油大学（华东）储运与建筑工程学院；2.国家石油天然气管网集团有限公司

Author(s):: LIU Cuiwei¹; HONG Weimin¹; WANG Duocai²; ZHI Shujie²; ZHANG Rui¹; DUAN Yao¹; JING Xiaohan¹; LI Yuxing¹; 1.College of Pipeline and Civil Engineering, China University of Petroleum (East China); 2.China Oil & Gas Pipeline Network Corporation

关键词:: 地下储氢; 地质; 渗流; 材料; 注采

Keywords:: underground hydrogen storage; geology; seepage; material; injection-extraction

分类号:: TE822

DOI:: 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2023.08.001

文献标志码:: A

摘要:: 在实现“双碳”战略与能源转型过程中，氢气经管道运输后大规模储存的调峰作用尤为重要，其中地下储氢技术被认为是大规模储氢的最可行方案。目前，中国尚无地下储氢工程。为了推动地下储氢技术发展，综述了地下储氢技术的研究进展及瓶颈问题，分析了地下储氢技术在地质、渗流、材料、注采方面的可行性。结果表明：盐穴中可能发生的地球化学反应、地下微生物反应较少，钢材腐蚀、产氢率降低等问题相对不严重，是较为理想的储氢结构；盐岩具有良好的氢气密封性能，而氢气在枯竭油气藏与含水层结构中的不稳定运移更剧烈，将会导致较为严重的氢气泄漏；金属、水泥及橡胶弹性体材料均有可能在地下储氢环境中发生劣化、渗漏导致材料失效，需针对具体储氢库环境选用合适材料以降低材料失效概率；采用较低的注氢速率、降低垫气分子量可提高氢气采收率。采取优化注采萃取速率与关井期、定期除杂以及使用生物杀菌剂等措施有助于提升氢气纯度。研究结果可为中国未来的地下储氢技术发展提供借鉴与参考。（图6，参93）

Abstract:: In the course of the struggle for the “dual carbon” strategy and energy transformation, the peak shaving realized by the large-scale storage of hydrogen transported via pipeline is very important, while the underground hydrogen storage technology is recognized as the most feasible solution for large-scale hydrogen storage. So far as can be ascertained, no underground hydrogen storage project has been implemented in China. In pursuit of the accelerated development of underground hydrogen storage technology, a review was made concerning the research progress and technical bottlenecks. Meanwhile, a feasibility analysis was performed in terms of geology, seepage, materials and injection-extraction. Ultimately, the following results were obtained: As a result of few geochemical reactions and underground microbial reactions in salt caverns, there are less prominent steel corrosion and a drop in hydrogen production rate, making such salt caverns ideal hydrogen storage structures. Despite the good hydrogen sealing performance of salt rocks, the particularly violent unstable migration of hydrogen in depleted oil and gas reservoirs and aquifer structures may lead to serious hydrogen leakage. Metal, cement and rubber elastomer materials may be deteriorated and result in seepage in the underground hydrogen storage environment, further leading to material failure. Thus, appropriate materials should be selected according to the specific hydrogen storage environment to reduce the material failure probability. Besides, the hydrogen recovery can be enhanced by a lower hydrogen injection rate and reduced molecular weight of cushion gas. Moreover, the measures, such as the adoption of the optimized injection-extraction rate and shut-in time, regular impurity removal and application of biological bactericides, are conducive to improving the purity of hydrogen. Generally, the research results are expected to provide some references for the future development of underground hydrogen storage technology in China. (6 Figures, 93 References)

参考文献/References:

[1] HEINEMANN N, ALCALDE J, MIOCIC J M, HANGX S J T, KALLMEYER J, OSTERTAG-HENNING C, et al. Enabling large-scale hydrogen storage in porous media-the scientific challenges[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2021, 14(2):853-864. DOI: 10.1039/D0EE03536J.
[2] IEA. The future of hydrogen: seizing today’s opportunities[M]. Vienna:International Energy Agency, 2019: 1-7.
[3] RAZA A, ARIF M, GLATZ G, MAHMOUD M, AL KOBAISI M, ALAFNAN S, et al. A holistic overview of underground hydrogen storage: influencing factors, current understanding, and outlook[J]. Fuel, 2022, 330: 125636. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125636.
[4] TARKOWSKI R, ULIASZ-MISIAK B. Towards underground hydrogen storage: a review of barriers[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2022, 162: 112451. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112451.
[5] ZIVAR D, KUMAR S, FOROOZESH J. Underground hydrogen storage: a comprehensive review[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(45): 23436-23462. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.138.
[6] 付盼，罗淼，夏焱，李国韬，班凡生.氢气地下存储技术现状及难点研究[J].中国井矿盐，2020，51（6）：19-23. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0335.2020.06.008. FU P, LUO M, XIA Y, LI G T, BAN F S. Research on status and difficulties of hydrogen underground storage technology[J]. China Well and Rock Salt, 2020, 51(6): 19-23.
[7] NAVAID H B, EMADI H, WATSON M. A comprehensive literature review on the challenges associated with underground hydrogen storage[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(28): 10603-10635. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.11.225.
[8] HEMATPUR H, ABDOLLAHI R, ROSTAMI S, HAGHIGHI M, BLUNT M J. Review of underground hydrogen storage:concepts and challenges[J]. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2023, 7(2): 111-131. DOI: 10.46690/ager.2023.02.05.
[9] 陆佳敏，徐俊辉，王卫东，王浩，徐孜俊，陈留平.大规模地下储氢技术研究展望[J].储能科学与技术，2022，11（11）：3699-3707. 10.19799/j.cnki.2095-4239.2022.0297. LU J M, XU J H, WANG W D, WANG H, XU Z J, CHEN L P. Development of large-scale underground hydrogen storage technology[J]. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2022, 11(11): 3699-3707.
[10] 柏明星，宋考平，徐宝成，孙建鹏，冯福平，陈阵，等.氢气地下存储的可行性、局限性及发展前景[J].地质论评，2014，60（4）：748-754. 10.16509/j.georeview.2014.04.024. BAI M X, SONG K P, XU B C, SUN J P, FENG F P, CHEN Z, et al. Feasibility, limitation and prospect of H2 underground storage[J]. Geological Review, 2014, 60(4): 748-754.
[11] THIYAGARAJAN S R, EMADI H, HUSSAIN A, PATANGE P, WATSON M. A comprehensive review of the mechanisms and efficiency of underground hydrogen storage[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 51: 104490. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.104490.
[12] BECKMAN K L, DETERMEYER P L, MOWREY E H. Natural gas storage: historical development and expected evolution: PB-95-249900/XAB[J]. Houston: International Gas Consulting, Inc., 1995: 249900.
[13] BO Z K, ZENG L P, CHEN Y Q, XIE Q. Geochemical reactions-induced hydrogen loss during underground hydrogen storage in sandstone reservoirs[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(38): 19998-20009. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.116.
[14] HASSANPOURYOUZBAND A, ADIE K, COWEN T, THAYSEN E M, HEINEMANN N, BUTLER I B, et al. Geological hydrogen storage: geochemical reactivity of hydrogen with sandstone reservoirs[J]. ACS Energy Letters, 2022, 7(7):2203-2210. DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c01024.
[15] THAYSEN E M, MCMAHON S, STROBEL G J, BUTLER I B, NGWENYA B T, HEINEMANN N, et al. Estimating microbial growth and hydrogen consumption in hydrogen storage in porous media[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2021, 151: 111481. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111481.
[16] DOPFFEL N, JANSEN S, GERRITSE J. Microbial side effects of underground hydrogen storage - knowledge gaps, risks and opportunities for successful implementation[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(12): 8594-8606. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.12.058.
[17] EBIGBO A, GOLFIER F, QUINTARD M. A coupled, pore-scale model for methanogenic microbial activity in underground hydrogen storage[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2013, 61:74-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.09.004.
[18] DORNSEIFFER P, MEYER B, HEINZLE E. Modeling of anaerobic formate kinetics in mixed biofilm culture using dynamic membrane mass spectrometric measurement[J]. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1995, 45(3): 219-228. DOI:10.1002/bit.260450306.
[19] MIOCIC J, HEINEMANN N, EDLMANN K, SCAFIDI J, MOLAEI F, ALCALDE J. Underground hydrogen storage: a review[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 2023, 528(1): SP528-2022-88. DOI: 10.1144/SP528-2022-88.
[20] MUHAMMED N S, HAQ B, AL SHEHRI D, AL-AHMED A, RAHMAN M M, ZAMAN E. A review on underground hydrogen storage: insight into geological sites, influencing factors and future outlook[J]. Energy Reports, 2022, 8: 461-499. DOI:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.12.002.
[21] NAZARY MOGHADAM S, MIRZABOZORG H, NOORZAD A. Modeling time-dependent behavior of gas caverns in rock salt considering creep, dilatancy and failure[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2013, 33: 171-185. DOI:10.1016/j.tust.2012.10.001.
[22] CARTER N L, HANSEN F D, SENSENY P E. Stress magnitudes in natural rock salt[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 1982, 87(B11): 9289-9300. DOI: 10.1029/JB087iB11p09289.
[23] LIANG W G, ZHAO Y S, XU S G, DUSSEAULT M B. Effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of salt rock[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2011, 48(1): 161-167. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2010.06.012.
[24] LYU C, LIU J F, REN Y, LIANG C, LIAO Y L. Study on very long-term creep tests and nonlinear creep-damage constitutive model of salt rock[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2021, 146: 104873. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms. 2021.104873.
[25] 贾晋，王成虎，王璞.枯竭气藏型储气库中地质力学问题浅谈[M]//中国地震局地壳应力研究所.地壳构造与地壳应力文集.北京：地震出版社，2018：116-125. JIA J, WANG C H, WANG P. Discussion on geomechanical problems in exhausted gas reservoir type gas storage[M]//Institute of Crustal Stress, China Earthquake Administration. Collected works on crustal structure and crustal stress. Beijing:Seismological Press, 2018: 116-125.
[26] JEANNE P, ZHANG Y Q, RUTQVIST J. Influence of hysteretic stress path behavior on seal integrity during gas storage operation in a depleted reservoir[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2020, 12(4): 886-899. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.06.002.
[27] BAI T, TAHMASEBI P. Coupled hydro-mechanical analysis of seasonal underground hydrogen storage in a saline aquifer[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 50: 104308. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.104308.
[28] 杨军伟，仲家锐，贾善坡，滕振超，杨典森.含水层储气库注入阶段盖层力学完整性数值模拟分析[J].东北石油大学学报，2021， 45（3）：86-98. 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4107.2021.03.009. YANG J W, ZHONG J R, JIA S P, TENG Z C, YANG D S. Numerical simulation analysis of mechanical integrity of caprock during injection stage of aquifer gas reservoir[J]. Journal of Northeast Petroleum University, 2021, 45(3): 86-98.
[29] SANDER R, PAN Z J, CONNELL L D. Laboratory measurement of low permeability unconventional gas reservoir rocks: a review of experimental methods[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 37: 248-279. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.11.041.
[30] ZHONG X Y, ZHU Y S, LIU L P, YANG H M, LI Y F, XIE Y H, et al. The characteristics and influencing factors of permeability stress sensitivity of tight sandstone reservoirs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 191:107221. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107221.
[31] CHEN T Y, FENG X T, CUI G L, TAN Y L, PAN Z J. Experimental study of permeability change of organic-rich gas shales under high effective stress[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2019, 64: 1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse. 2019.01.014.
[32] ZHENG J T, ZHENG L G, LIU H H, JU Y. Relationships between permeability, porosity and effective stress for low-permeability sedimentary rock[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2015, 78: 304-318. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2015.04.025.
[33] HAGEMANN B, RASOULZADEH M, PANFILOV M, GANZER L, REITENBACH V. Mathematical modeling of unstable transport in underground hydrogen storage[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73(11): 6891-6898. DOI:10.1007/s12665-015-4414-7.
[34] PAN B, YIN X, JU Y, IGLAUER S. Underground hydrogen storage: influencing parameters and future outlook[J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2021, 294: 102473. DOI:10.1016/j.cis.2021.102473.
[35] LUBO K, TARKOWSKI R. Influence of capillary threshold pressure and injection well location on the dynamic CO2 and H2 storage capacity for the deep geological structure[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(58):30048-30060. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.06.119.
[36] CARDEN P O, PATERSON L. Physical, chemical and energy aspects of underground hydrogen storage[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 1979, 4(6): 559-569. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3199(79)90083-1.
[37] 刘中云，曾庆辉，唐周怀，张公社.润湿性对采收率及相对渗透率的影响[J].石油与天然气地质，2000，21（2）：148-150. 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9985.2000.02.014. LIU Z Y, ZENG Q H, TANG Z H, ZHANG G S. Effect of wettability on recovery and relative permeability[J]. Oil &Gas Geology, 2000, 21(2): 148-150.
[38] PERERA M S A. A review of underground hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs: insights into various rock-fluid interaction mechanisms and their impact on the process integrity[J]. Fuel, 2023, 334(Part 1): 126677. DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126677.
[39] AL-YASERI A, ESTEBAN L, GIWELLI A, SAROUT J, LEBEDEV M, SARMADIVALEH M. Initial and residual trapping of hydrogen and nitrogen in Fontainebleau sandstone using nuclear magnetic resonance core flooding[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(53): 22482-22494. DOI:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.059.
[40] AL-YASERI A, JHA N K. On hydrogen wettability of basaltic rock[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 200: 108387. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108387.
[41] ALI M, JHA N K, AL-YASERI A, ZHANG Y H, IGLAUER S, SARMADIVALEH M. Hydrogen wettability of quartz substrates exposed to organic acids; Implications for hydrogen geo-storage in sandstone reservoirs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 207: 109081. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109081.
[42] IGLAUER S, ALI M, KESHAVARZ A. Hydrogen wettability of sandstone reservoirs: implications for hydrogen geo-storage[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2021, 48(3):e2020GL090814. DOI: 10.1029/2020GL090814.
[43] HOSSEINI M, ALI M, FAHIMPOUR J, KESHAVARZ A, IGLAUER S. Assessment of rock-hydrogen and rock-water interfacial tension in shale, evaporite and basaltic rocks[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2022, 106:104743. DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104743.
[44] AL-KHDHEEAWI E A, VIALLE S, BARIFCANI A, SARMADIVALEH M, IGLAUER S. Impact of reservoir wettability and heterogeneity on CO2-plume migration and trapping capacity[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2017, 58: 142-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.01.012.
[45] VAVRA C L, KALDI J G, SNEIDER R M. Geological applications of capillary pressure: a review[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1992, 76(6): 840-850. DOI: 10.1306/BDFF88F8-1718-11D7-8645000102C1865D.
[46] LUBO K, TARKOWSKI R. Numerical simulation of hydrogen injection and withdrawal to and from a deep aquifer in NW Poland[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2020, 45(3): 2068-2083. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.055.
[47] YEKTA A E, MANCEAU J C, GABOREAU S, PICHAVANT M, AUDIGANE P. Determination of hydrogen-water relative permeability and capillary pressure in sandstone:application to underground hydrogen injection in sedimentary formations[J]. Transport in Porous Media, 2018, 122(2):333-356. DOI: 10.1007/s11242-018-1004-7.
[48] HEMME C. Storage of gases in deep geological structures:spatial and temporal hydrogeochemical processes evaluated and predicted by the development and application of numerical modeling[D]. Clausthal-Zellerfeld: Clausthal University of Technology, 2019. DOI: 10.21268/20190613-0.
[49] LORD A S, KOBOS P H, BORNS D J. Geologic storage of hydrogen: scaling up to meet city transportation demands[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39(28):15570-15582. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.07.121.
[50] LIU W, CHEN J, JIANG D Y, SHI X L, LI Y P, DAEMEN J J K, et al. Tightness and suitability evaluation of abandoned salt caverns served as hydrocarbon energies storage under adverse geological conditions (AGC)[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 178:703-720. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.086.
[51] MAHDI D S, AL-KHDHEEAWI E A, YUAN Y J, ZHANG Y H, IGLAUER S. Hydrogen underground storage efficiency in a heterogeneous sandstone reservoir[J]. Advances in Geo-Energy Research, 2021, 5(4): 437-443. DOI: 10.46690/ager.2021.04.08.
[52] CROTOGINO F, HAMELMANN R. Wasserstoff-speicherung in salzkavernen zur gl?ttung des windstromangebots[R]. Hannover: KBB Underground Technologies GmbH, 2007: 1-7.
[53] AL-MUKAINAH H, AL-YASERI A, YEKEEN N, AL HAMAD J, MAHMOUD M. Wettability of shale-brine-H2 system and H2-brine interfacial tension for assessment of the sealing capacities of shale formations during underground hydrogen storage[J]. Energy Reports, 2022, 8: 8830-8843. DOI:10.1016/j.egyr.2022.07.004.
[54] IGLAUER S. Optimum geological storage depths for structural H2 geo-storage[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 212: 109498. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109498.
[55] WOLFF-BOENISCH D, ABID H R, TUCEK J E, KESHAVARZ A, IGLAUER S. Importance of clay-H2 interactions for large-scale underground hydrogen storage[J].International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(37):13934-13942. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.12.324.
[56] UGARTE E R, SALEHI S. A review on well integrity issues for underground hydrogen storage[J]. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 2022, 144(4): 042001. DOI: 10.1115/1. 4052626.
[57] AL-YASERI A, YEKEEN N, MAHMOUD M, KAKATI A, XIE Q, GIWELLI A. Thermodynamic characterization of H2-brine-shale wettability: implications for hydrogen storage at subsurface[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(53): 22510-22521. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.086.
[58] ALI M, YEKEEN N, PAL N, KESHAVARZ A, IGLAUER S, HOTEIT H. Influence of pressure, temperature and organic surface concentration on hydrogen wettability of caprock;implications for hydrogen geo-storage[J]. Energy Reports, 2021, 7: 5988-5996. DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2021.09.016.
[59] ALI M, YEKEEN N, PAL N, KESHAVARZ A, IGLAUER S, HOTEIT H. Influence of organic molecules on wetting characteristics of mica/H2/brine systems: implications for hydrogen structural trapping capacities[J]. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2022, 608(Part 2): 1739-1749. DOI:10.1016/j.jcis.2021.10.080.
[60] ALI M, PAN B, YEKEEN N, AL-ANSSARI S, AL-ANAZI A, KESHAVARZ A, et al. Assessment of wettability and rock-fluid interfacial tension of caprock: implications for hydrogen and carbon dioxide geo-storage[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(30): 14104-14120. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.02.149.
[61] ALANAZI A, ALI M, MOWAFI M, HOTEIT H. Effect of organics and nanofluids on capillary-sealing efficiency of caprock for hydrogen and carbon-dioxide geological storage[C]. Abu Dhabi: International Geomechanics Symposium, 2022: ARMA-IGS-2022-009.
[62] BENSING J P, MISCH D, SKERBISCH L, SACHSENHOFER R F. Hydrogen-induced calcite dissolution in Amaltheenton Formation claystones: implications for underground hydrogen storage caprock integrity[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47(71): 30621-30626. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.023.
[63] 姜放，戴海黔，曹小燕，黄红兵.油套管在CO2和H2S共存时的腐蚀机理研究[J].石油与天然气化工，2005，34（3）：213-215. 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3426.2005.03.019.JIANG F, DAI H Q, CAO X Y, HUANG H B. The experiment research of a corrosion mechanism about the tube in CO2 and H2S environment[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil and Gas, 2005, 34(3): 213-215, 148.
[64] 李春福，邓洪达，王斌.高含H2S/CO2环境中套管钢腐蚀行为与腐蚀产物膜关系[J].材料热处理学报，2008，29（1）：89-93. LI C F, DENG H D, WANG B. Influence of corrosion scale on corrosion behavior of casing pipe steels in environment containing H2S and CO2[J]. Transactions of Materials and Heat Treatment, 2008, 29(1): 89-93.
[65] 孙建波，苏鑫，张勇.高温高压H2S/CO2腐蚀产物膜对低铬钢氢渗透行为的影响[J].表面技术，2018，47（6）：17-23. 10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2018.06.003. SUN J B, SU X, ZHANG Y. Effect of H2S/CO2 corrosion scales on the hydrogen permeation behavior of low Chromium steels[J]. Surface Technology, 2018, 47(6): 17-23.
[66] 丁磊，姚勇，张志远，窦志超.慢应变拉伸法模拟含氢储气库管材的应力腐蚀试验研究[J].钢管，2017，46（5）：18-24. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2311.2017.05.005. DING L, YAO Y, ZHANG Z Y, DOU Z C. Study on SSC test to pipe for hydrogen-containing gas storage service with SSRT simulation method[J]. Steel Pipe, 2017, 46(5): 18-24.
[67] 耿捷，赵永峰. Cr13钢在CO2/H2S环境中腐蚀规律试验研究[J].石油矿场机械，2013，42（11）：66-71. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3482. 2013.11.017. GENG J, ZHAO Y F. Experimental study of corrosion law of Cr13 steel in CO2/H2S corrosion environment[J]. Oil Field Equipment, 2013, 42(11): 66-71.
[68] 张弘，袁光杰，万继方，张施琦，李景翠，刘天恩，等. P110级管材在含氢储气库环境中的腐蚀行为[J].天然气工业，2022， 42（11）：117-123. 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2022.11.012. ZHANG H, YUAN G J, WAN J F, ZHANG S Q, LI J C, LIU T E, et al. Corrosion behavior of P110 pipe in the environment of hydrogen-containing gas storage[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(11): 117-123.
[69] GHOSH G, ROSTRON P, GARG R, PANDAY A. Hydrogen induced cracking of pipeline and pressure vessel steels: a review[J]. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 199: 609-618. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.06.018.
[70] 蒋庆梅，张小强.氢气长输管道钢管选材研究[J].油气田地面工程，2016，35（9）：1-3. 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6896. 2016.9.001.JIANG Q M, ZHANG X Q. Study on pipe material selection of long distance hydrogen transportation pipeline[J]. Oil-Gas Field Surface Engineering, 2016, 35(9): 1-3.
[71] ZENG L P, SARMADIVALEH M, SAEEDI A, CHEN Y Q, ZHONG Z Q, XIE Q. Storage integrity during underground hydrogen storage in depleted gas reservoirs[J/OL]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews: 1-79[2023-05-09]. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21039.82083. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.21039.82083.
[72] STRAZISAR B, KUTCHKO B, HUERTA N. Chemical reactions of wellbore cement under CO2 storage conditions:effects of cement additives[J]. Energy Procedia, 2009, 1(1):3603-3607. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.155.
[73] SANTRA A, REDDY B R, LIANG F, FITZGERALD R. Reaction of CO2 with Portland cement at downhole conditions and the role of pozzolanic supplements[C]. The Woodlands:SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, 2009:SPE-121103-MS. DOI: 10.2118/121103-MS.
[74] А·Ф·阿克拉莫维奇，刘春全. H2S对固井材料的腐蚀过程研究[J].西南石油大学学报（自然科学版），2010，32（6）：1-4. 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2010.06.001.АКРАМОВИЧ А Ф, LIU C Q. Study on the corrosion process of H2S on cementing materials[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2010, 32(6): 1-4.
[75] 桂强.水泥基材料气体渗透性研究[D].北京：清华大学，2016. GUI Q. Study on gas permeability of cement-based materials[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 2016.
[76] REITENBACH V, GANZER L, ALBRECHT D, HAGEMANN B. Influence of added hydrogen on underground gas storage: a review of key issues[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2015, 73(11): 6927-6937. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-015-4176-2.
[77] JONES R R, CARPENTER R B. New latex, expanding thixotropic cement systems improve job performance and reduce costs[C]. Anaheim: SPE International Symposium on Oilfield Chemistry, 1991: SPE-21010-MS.
[78] 陈明战.气体快速减压下橡胶破裂失效机理研究[D].大庆：东北石油大学，2021. CHEN M Z. Mechanism research of rubber fracturing failure induced by rapid gas decompression[D]. Daqing: Northeast Petroleum University, 2021.
[79] SALEHI S, EZEAKACHA C P, KWATIA G, AHMED R,TEODORIU C. Performance verification of elastomer materials in corrosive gas and liquid conditions[J]. Polymer Testing, 2019, 75: 48-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.01.015.
[80] CONG C B, CUI C C, MENG X Y, LU S J, ZHOU Q. Degradation of hydrogenated nitrile-butadiene rubber in aqueous solutions of H2S or HCl[J]. Chemical Research in Chinese Universities, 2013, 29(4): 806-810. DOI: 10.1007/s40242-013-2401-7.
[81] PATEL H, SALEHI S, AHMED R, TEODORIU C. Review of elastomer seal assemblies in oil & gas wells: performance evaluation, failure mechanisms, and gaps in industry standards[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 179: 1046-1062. DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.05.019.
[82] ERSHADNIA R, SINGH M, MAHMOODPOUR S, MEYAL A, MOEINI F, HOSSEINI S A, et al. Impact of geological and operational conditions on underground hydrogen storage[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48(4):1450-1471. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.09.208.
[83] FLORIS F J T, BUSH M D, CUYPERS M, ROGGERO F, SYVERSVEEN A R. Methods for quantifying the uncertainty of production forecasts: a comparative study[J]. Petroleum Geoscience, 2001, 7(S): 87-96. DOI: 10.1144/petgeo.7.S.S87.
[84] HASSANPOURYOUZBAND A, JOONAKI E, EDLMANN K, HEINEMANN N, YANG J H. Thermodynamic and transport properties of hydrogen containing streams[J]. Scientific Data, 2020, 7(1): 222. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-020-0568-6.
[85] KUNZ O, WAGNER W. The GERG-2008 wide-range equation of state for natural gases and other mixtures: an expansion of GERG-2004[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 2012, 57(11): 3032-3091. DOI: 10.1021/je300655b.
[86] JAHANBANI M, NICK H M, ALIZADEH KIAPI M R, MAHMOODI A. A site assessment tool for H2 storage in depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs[J/OL]. engrXiv: 1-9[2023-05-09]. https://doi.org/10.31224/osf.io/qnhcw. DOI: 10.31224/osf.io/qnhcw.
[87] PRUESS K, OLDENBURG C M, MORIDIS G J. TOUGH2 user’s guide version 2: LBNL-43134[R]. Berkeley: Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1999.
[88] TAKU IDE S, JESSEN K, ORR F M, Jr. Storage of CO2 in saline aquifers: effects of gravity, viscous, and capillary forces on amount and timing of trapping[J]. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2007, 1(4): 481-491. DOI: 10.1016/S1750-5836(07)00091-6.
[89] KANAANI M, SEDAEE B, ASADIAN-PAKFAR M. Role of cushion gas on underground hydrogen storage in depleted oil reservoirs[J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 45: 103783. DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2021.103783.
[90] FELDMANN F, HAGEMANN B, GANZER L, PANFILOV M. Numerical simulation of hydrodynamic and gas mixing processes in underground hydrogen storages[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(16): 1165. DOI: 10.1007/s12665-016-5948-z.
[91] PFEIFFER W T, BAUER S. Subsurface porous media hydrogen storage-scenario development and simulation[J]. Energy Procedia, 2015, 76: 565-572. DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.872.
[92] HEINEMANN N, SCAFIDI J, PICKUP G, THAYSEN E M, HASSANPOURYOUZBAND A, WILKINSON M, et al. Hydrogen storage in saline aquifers: the role of cushion gas for injection and production[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(79): 39284-39296. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.09.174.
[93] SAINZ-GARCIA A, ABARCA E, RUBI V, GRANDIA F. Assessment of feasible strategies for seasonal underground hydrogen storage in a saline aquifer[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42(26): 16657-16666. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.05.076.

相似文献/References:

[1]李建君,王立东,刘春,等.金坛盐穴储气库腔体畸变影响因素[J].油气储运,2014,33(3):269.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2014.03.010]
　LI Jianjun,WANG Lidong,LIU Chun,et al.Factors affecting cavities distortion of Jintan Salt Cavern Gas Storage[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2014,33(08):269.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2014.03.010]
[2]史航,曾志华,左雷斌.中缅油气管道澜沧江桥隧工程穿跨越总体设计[J].油气储运,2014,33(10):1034.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2014.10.002]
　SHI Hang,ZENG Zhihua,ZUO Leibin.Overall design of Lantsang bridge and tunnel crossing project for the Myanmar-China Oil and Gas Pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2014,33(08):1034.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2014.10.002]

备注/Memo

刘翠伟，男，1987年生，副教授，2016年博士毕业于中国石油大学（华东）油气储运工程专业，现主要从事天然气及氢气管道安全输送技术研究。地址：山东省青岛市黄岛区长江西路66号，266580。电话：13468286715。Email：20180093@upc.edu.cn
通信作者：李玉星，男，1970年生，教授，博士生导师，国家重点研发计划“氢能技术”重点专项首席专家，1997年博士毕业于中国石油大学（北京）油气储运工程专业，现主要从事油气及特殊气体管输技术研究。地址：山东省青岛市黄岛区长江西路66号，266580。电话：13370809333。Email：liyx@upc.edu.cn
基金项目：国家重点研发计划“氢能技术”重点专项课题“中低压纯氢与掺氢燃气管道系统渗氢扩散机理与相容性研究”，2021YFB4001601。
（收稿日期：2023-05-29；修回日期：2023-06-09；编辑：刘朝阳）

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-08-25