[1]熊毅,高萍,赵潇,等.天然气管道泄漏应急抢修过程的动态AHP风险评价[J].油气储运,2021,40(12):1423-1429.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.12.014]
 XIONG Yi,GAO Ping,ZHAO Xiao,et al.Dynamic AHP-based risk assessment for emergency repair of natural gas pipeline leakage[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2021,40(12):1423-1429.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.12.014]
点击复制

天然气管道泄漏应急抢修过程的动态AHP风险评价

参考文献/References:

[1] 王向阳,杜美萍,汪彤,白永强,向阳. 埋地燃气管道泄漏扩散过 程数值模拟[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2018,28(2):45-50. WANG X Y, DU M P, WANG T, BAI Y Q, XIANG Y. Numerical simulation of leakage of gas from buried pipeline and its diffusion process[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2018, 28(2): 45-50.
[2] 梁永宽,杨馥铭,尹哲祺,陈柏杰. 油气管道事故统计与风险分 析[J]. 油气储运,2017,36(4):472-476. LIANG Y K, YANG F M, YIN Z Q, CHEN B J. Accident statistics and risk analysis of oil and gas pipelines[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2017, 36(4): 472-476.
[3] CHEN X F, WU Z Z, CHEN W T, KANG R X, HE X Z, MIAO Y C. Selection of key indicators for reputation loss in oil and gas pipeline failure event[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2019, 99: 69-84.
[4] 周建新,吴轩,郭再富. 美国管道事故对我国油气管道安全的启 示[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术,2014,10(增刊1):73-78. ZHOU J X, WU X, GUO Z F. Enlightenment from incidents of oil and gas pipeline in USA[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2014, 10(S1): 73-78.
[5] 全恺,梁伟,张来斌,俞徐超,李元. 基于故障树与贝叶斯网 络的川气东送管道风险分析[J]. 油气储运,2017,36(9): 1001-1006. QUAN K, LIANG W, ZHANG L B, YU X C, LI Y. Risk analysis of Sichuan-to-East Gas Pipeline based on Fault Tree and Bayesian Network[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2017, 36(9): 1001-1006.
[6] 狄彦,帅健,王晓霖,石磊. 油气管道事故原因分析及分类方法 研究[J]. 中国安全科学学报,2013,23(7):109-115. DI Y, SHUAI J, WANG X L, SHI L. Study on methods for classifying oil & gas pipeline incidents[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2013, 23(7): 109-115.
[7] 付明福,张明星,朱晓曼,龚晓凤,谭波. 油气长输管道作业分 级定量风险评价方法研究及应用[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2019,15(7):137-141. FU M F, ZHANG M X, ZHU X M, GONG X F, TAN B. Research and application of quantitative risk assessment method for operation classification of oil and gas long-distance pipeline[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2019, 15(7): 137-141.
[8] 郑洪龙,黄维和. 油气管道及储运设施安全保障技术发展现状 及展望[J]. 油气储运,2017,36(1):1-7. ZHENG H L, HUANG W H. Development status and prospect of safety insurance technologies for oil & gas pipelines and storage and transportation facilities[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2017, 36(1): 1-7.
[9] 李莉,张玉志,张斌,田望,王乐乐. 油气管道运行维护技术研究 进展及展望[J]. 油气储运,2017,36(3):249-254. LI L, ZHANG Y Z, ZHANG B, TIAN W, WANG L L. Research progress and prospect of oil and gas pipeline operation and maintenance technologies[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2017, 36(3): 249-254.
[10] 仇九子. 青岛市“ 11 · 22” 东黄输油管道泄漏爆炸事故处置分 析[J]. 中国应急救援,2014(1):43-45. CHOU J Z. Disposal analysis of the “Nov.22” Donghuang oil pipeline leakage and explosion accident in Qingdao City[J]. China Emergency Rescue, 2014(1): 43-45.
[11] 刘小军. 天然气长输管道抢修作业管理对策[J]. 化工管理, 2015(25):136-137. LIU X J. Management countermeasures for rush repair of natural gas pipeline[J]. Chemical Enterprise Management, 2015(25): 136-137.
[12] 谢安俊. 天然气管道应急救援系统及其信息技术[J]. 天然气工 业,2006,26(5):115-117. XIE A J. Emergency-aid system and information technology for natural gas pipeline[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2006, 26(5): 115-117.
[13] 马庆春,张来斌,樊建春. 基于状态监测的井喷风险动态安全 评价[J]. 安全与环境学报,2009,9(6):176-179. MA Q C, ZHANG L B, FAN J C. Novel dynamic hazards assessment model for well blowout based on its operating state monitoring[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2009, 9(6): 176-179.
[14] 方可,杨明. 仿真系统校核中的动态AHP 网研究[J]. 系统工 程与电子技术,2011,33(3):707-711. FANG K, YANG M. Dynamic AHP net for simulation systems verifi cation[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2011, 33(3): 707-711.
[15] HARKER P T. The art and science of decision making: the analytic hierarchy process[M]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1989: 3-36.
[16] ACHARYA V, SHARMA S K, KUMAR GUPTA S. Analyzing the factors in industrial automation using analytic hierarchy process[J]. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 2018, 71: 877-886.
[17] 邓雪,李家铭,曾浩健,陈俊羊,赵俊峰. 层次分析法权重计算 方法分析及其应用研究[J]. 数学的实践与认识,2012,42(7): 93-100. DENG X, LI J M, ZENG H J, CHEN J Y, ZHAO J F. Research on computation methods of AHP wight vector and its applications[J]. Mathematics in Practice and Theory, 2012, 42(7): 93-100.
[18] 马贯一,杨超宇. 基于动态AHP 的个人健康状态模糊综合评 价研究[J]. 信息与电脑(理论版),2012(12):174-176. MA G Y, YANG C Y. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of individual health status based on dynamic AHP[J]. China Computer & Communication, 2012(12): 174-176.
[19] BADIDA P, BALASUBRAMANIAM Y, JAYAPRAKASH J. Risk evaluation of oil and natural gas pipelines due to natural hazards using fuzzy fault tree analysis[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2019, 66: 284-292.
[20] 崔茂林,吴长春. 输气管道投产中氮气置换的原则及技巧[J]. 天然气工业,2015,35(2):81-86. CUI M L, WU C C. Principles of and tips for the nitrogen gas displacement in the gas pipeline debugging practices[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(2): 81-86.

相似文献/References:

[1]闫杰 刘寒冰 崔莹莹.油气管道维抢修队伍应急抢修区域化管理[J].油气储运,2012,31(9):711.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.09.018]
 Yan Jie,Liu Hanbing,Cui Yingying. Regional management of emergency repair crew for emergency repair of oil and gas pipelines[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2012,31(12):711.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.09.018]
[2]刘啸奔,张宏,夏梦莹,等.基于主成分分析和神经网络的管道泄漏识别方法[J].油气储运,2015,34(7):737.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2015.07.011]
 LIU Xiaoben,ZHANG Hong,XIA Mengying,et al.Pipeline leakage recognition based on principal component analysis and neural network[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2015,34(12):737.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2015.07.011]

备注/Memo

收稿日期:2020-02-11;修回日期:2021-10-15;编辑:韩文超
基金项目:国家重点研发计划“海洋( 深水) 油气开采重大安全事故连锁风险演化、灾变机理及应对机制”,2017YFC0804501;国家自然科学基金青年基金资助项目“基于背景纹影原理的危险气体泄漏可视化检测方法研究”,51304228。
作者简介:熊毅,男,1982 年生,讲师,2010 年博士毕业于清华大学机械工程专业,现主要从事安全检测、动态风险分析方向的研究工作。地址:北京市昌平区府学路18 号,102249。电话:13466368001。Email:xiongyi@cup.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-12-25