PDF下载/HTML
分享
[1]陈杨,王为民,陈伟聪,等.基于故障树与模糊理论的埋地管道风险评价[J].油气储运,2011,30(07):481-485.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.07.001]
　Chen Yang,Wang Weimin,Chen Weicong,et al.Risk assessment of the buried pipeline based on the fault tree and fuzzy theory[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(07):481-485.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.07.001]
点击复制

基于故障树与模糊理论的埋地管道风险评价

《油气储运》[ISSN:1000-8241/CN:13-1093/TE] 卷: 30 期数: 2011年07期 页码: 481-485 栏目: 出版日期: 2011-07-25
Title:
Risk assessment of the buried pipeline based on the fault tree and fuzzy theory
文章编号:
1000-8241(2011)07-0481-05
作者:
陈杨1; 王为民1; 陈伟聪1; 乔伟彪1; 胡宗柳1; 贺雷2
1.辽宁石油化工大学，辽宁抚顺 113001；?2.常州港华燃气有限公司，江苏常州 213000
Author(s):
Chen Yang; Wang Weimin; Chen Weicong; et al
Chen Yang： Liaoning Petrochemical University，Fushun，Liaoning，113001.
关键词:
埋地管道; 城市燃气; 故障树; 模糊综合评价法; 风险评价
Keywords:
buried pipeline; fault tree; fuzzy comprehensive; risk assessment
分类号:
TE88
DOI:
10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.07.001
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以常州港华燃气公司的工程数据为基础，建立了城市燃气埋地管道失效故障树，确定引起埋地管道失效的主要因素为第三方破坏、腐蚀、管道本质缺陷、管理维护不当，得出了导致埋地管道失效的48种基本事件。将故障树法与模糊综合评判法相结合，建立了埋地管道风险评价模型。详细说明了风险评价步骤，用影响埋地管道失效的主要因素作为埋地管道模糊综合评价模型的评价因素集,建立故障树底层各评价指标的因素等级隶属度，以及单因素评判矩阵和单因素权重集，进而得到单因素评判集和整体评价结果。实例证明，该模型对埋地管道的风险评价结果与实际情况相符，可为城市燃气公司的科学管理提供依据。
Abstract:
Based on the accumulated engineering data of Changzhou Gas Company，the fault tree of failure for the buried pipeline is established. The major factors of failure for the buried pipeline are determined as the third-party damage，corrosion，pipeline defects，management and improper maintenance. Forty-eight elementary events led to failure of the pipeline are obtained. Integrating the fault tree method into the fuzzy comprehensive assessment method，the risk assessment model for the buried pipeline is established.The risk assessment steps are as follows：（1） the major factors to impact the failure of the buried pipeline are used as the factor set of fuzzy comprehensive assessment model for buried pipeline；（2） the grade membership of factors for every bottom evaluation index of fault tree，judgement matrix and weight set of single factor are established，and （3） to achieve the judement set of single factor and entire evaluation result are made. A case shows that the risk assessment of buried pipeline results obtained by this model is in line with the actual event. It is considered that this model can provide a base in scientific management to other urban gas companies.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张扬.模糊综合评价技术在城市天然气管网运行风险评价中的应用[D].武汉：华中科技大学，2006.
[2]严大凡，翁永基，董绍华.油气长输管道风险评价与完整性管理[M].北京：化学工业出版社，2005：5-16.
[3]张景林，崔国璋.安全系统工程[M].北京：煤炭工业出版社，2002：153-157.
[4]王楷.基于事故树分析的压力管道风险评价方法研究[D].武汉：武汉理工大学，2009.
[5]梁保松，曹殿立.模糊数学及应用[M].北京：科学出版社，2007：121-125.
[6]Muhlbauer K W.Pipeline risk management manual[M].Houston：Gulf Publishing Company，1992：1-126.
[7]储敏.层次分析法中判断矩阵的构造问题[D].南京：南京理工大学，2005.

相似文献/References:

[1]赵永起 刘国群 张文东 路遥.城市燃气管网完整性管理实施流程[J].油气储运,2012,31(12):909.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.12.009]
　Zhao Yongqi,Liu Guoqun,Zhang Wendong,et al.The implementation flow process of integrity management for urban gas networks[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2012,31(07):909.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.12.009]
[2]周祥.埋地钢质管道外涂层缺陷的安全质量分级评价[J].油气储运,2011,30(04):299.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.04.017]
　Zhou Xiang.Safety quality grading evaluation on the external coating defects of buried steel pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(07):299.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.04.017]
[3]付吉强,吴明,杜明俊,等.埋地管道周围土壤湿热耦合相变过程的数值计算[J].油气储运,2011,30(01):30.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.01.008]
　Fu Jiqiang,Wu Ming,Du Mingjun,et al.Numerical calculation on heat-moisture coupling and phase change process of the soil around buried pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(07):30.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.01.008]
[4]胡士信,陆家榆,张本革,等.邻近强电线路管道交流干扰参数的测试方法[J].油气储运,2011,30(03):203.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.03.012]
　Hu Shixin,Lu Jiayu,Zhang Benge,et al.Test method of AC interference parameters for pipeline adjacent power transmission lines[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(07):203.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.03.012]
[5]李朝阳,马贵阳,刘亮.埋地输油管道泄漏油品扩散模拟[J].油气储运,2011,30(09):674.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.09.008]
　Li Zhaoyang,Ma Guiyang,Liu Liang,et al.Diffusion simulation on leaked oil for buried pipelines[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(07):674.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.09.008]
[6]杨义,孙慧,王梅.我国城市燃气发展现状与展望[J].油气储运,2011,30(10):725.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.10.002]
　Yang Yi,Sun Hui,Wang Mei.Current situation and prospect of urban gas in China[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(07):725.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.10.002]
[7]王鸿膺,蒋涛,秦晓霞,等.川气东送管道土壤腐蚀埋片试验[J].油气储运,2010,29(10):769.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2010.10.013]
　Wang Hongying,Jiang Tao,Qin Xiaoxia.Field Coupon Testing on the Soil Corrosivity of Sichuan-East Gas Pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2010,29(07):769.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2010.10.013]
[8]薛致远,张丰,毕武喜,等.东北管网阴极保护通电/断电电位测量与分析[J].油气储运,2010,29(10):772.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2010.10.014]
　Xue Zhiyuan,Zhang Feng,Bi Wuxi.The Measurement and Analysis of On/Off-potential in Northeast Oil Pipeline Networks[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2010,29(07):772.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2010.10.014]
[9]刘仕鳌 蒲红宇 刘书文 蒋洪.埋地管道应力分析方法[J].油气储运,2012,31(4):274.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.04.009]
　Liu Shiao,Pu Hongyu,Liu Shuwen,et al.Stress analysis method of buried pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2012,31(07):274.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2012.04.009]
[10]吴峰,李向阳,张治军.埋地参数对管道同沟敷设传热的影响[J].油气储运,2010,29(11):835.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2010.11.009]
　Wu Feng,Li Xiangyang,Zhang Zhijun.Influence of Buried Parameters for Heat Transfer of Pipelines Laid in One Ditch[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2010,29(07):835.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2010.11.009]

备注/Memo

作者简介：陈杨，在读硕士生，1985年生，2008年毕业于江苏工业学院油气储运工程专业，现主要从事油气长输管道定量风险评估技术研究。
电话：13904135834；Email：scn04452113@163.com???? ?（收稿日期：2010-12-06）

更新日期/Last Update: