PDF下载

[1]张笑影,马晓红,王聪,等.地质沉降作用下埋地玻璃钢管道的力学行为[J].油气储运,2024,43(06):1-13.
　ZHANG Xiaoying,MA Xiaohong,WANG Cong,et al.Mechanical behavior of buried FRP pipeline under geological settlement[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2024,43(06):1-13.

点击复制

地质沉降作用下埋地玻璃钢管道的力学行为

《油气储运》[ISSN:1000-8241/CN:13-1093/TE] 卷: 43 期数: 2024年06期页码: 1-13 栏目: 出版日期: 2024-06-25

Title:: Mechanical behavior of buried FRP pipeline under geological settlement

作者:: 张笑影; 马晓红; 王聪; 李振林; 张行; 董绍华

Author(s):: ZHANG Xiaoying; MA Xiaohong; WANG Cong; LI Zhenlin; ZHANG Hang; DONG Shaohua

关键词:: 玻璃钢管道; 地质沉降; 复合材料; 有限元

Keywords:: Fiberglass pipe; Geological settlement; composite materials; finite element

分类号:: TE832

文献标志码:: A

摘要:: 【目的】相比于常规金属管道，玻璃钢管道具有强度高、质量轻等优点，目前已在油气田站场集输领域逐渐投入应用。作为埋地管道面临的常见地质灾害，地质沉降对埋地玻璃钢管道的安全运行具有较大威胁，分析地质沉降作用下玻璃钢管道力学性能变化规律及其影响因素，有助于对保障其安全服役提供理论指导。【方法】使用有限元软件ABAQUS，考虑玻璃钢管道管材的多层非线性各向异性，建立埋地玻璃钢管道模型。基于Hashin失效准则研究不同缠绕角度、沉降量、土壤环境下玻璃钢管道基材及纤维压缩、拉伸初始化准则最大值的分布规律。【结果】地质沉降作用下，基材的压缩、拉伸初始化准则最大值相应大于纤维的压缩、拉伸初始化准则最大值，基材破坏模式对管道整体性能的影响更大；不同铺层缠绕角度工况下，隔层角度为±30°时管道失效系数最低，更有利于管道安全服役；管道各项失效系数的峰值均主要位于沉降过渡区中部位置附近及过渡区与沉降区交界处；土壤环境的改变对管道中间层失效系数影响最大。【结论】利用ABAQUS复合铺层模块能够较好地模拟玻璃钢复合管材的特性，相关结果能够为玻璃钢管道铺层缠绕选型及地质沉降工况管道安全情况分析提供理论依据。

Abstract:: Compared with the conventional metal pipeline, FRP pipeline has the advantages of high strength and light weight. It is gradually applied to the gathering and transportation of oilfield. Geological subsidence, as a common geological hazard of buried transportation pipeline, will pose a threat to the safe operation of buried FRP pipeline. In order to analyze the mechanical properties of FRP pipeline under geological settlement, a buried FRP pipeline model was established considering the nonlinear anisotropic pipe of FRP pipeline. Based on Hashin failure criterion, failure coefficient distribution of FRP pipeline under different winding angles, settlement amount and soil environment was studied. The results show that the base material stretch has a great influence on the pipeline performance under the action of geological settlement, and the pipeline is in a safer state when the layup winding Angle is ±30°. The peak value of the failure coefficient is near the middle of the transition zone of the pipeline and the junction of the transition zone and the settlement zone. The soil environment has the greatest influence on the failure coefficient of the middle layer of the pipeline

参考文献/References:

[1] 李宏斌.玻璃钢管道在介质中的适应性评价方法研究[J].油气田地面工程，2022，41（8）：29-33. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1006-6896.2022.08.006.

LI H B. Study on adaptability evaluation method of FRP pipeline in medium[J]. Oil-Gas Field Surface Engineering, 2022, 41(8): 29-33.

[2] 张晨，周松林，南洋，刘永，许华明.环氧树脂粘度对玻璃钢管道抗拉强度的影响[J].纤维复合材料，2022，39（1）：60-64. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1003-6423.2022.01.011.

ZHANG C, ZHOU S L, NAN Y, LIU Y, XU H M. Effect of viscosity of epoxy resin on tensile strength of FRP pipe[J]. Fiber Composites, 2022, 39(1): 60-64.

[3] 张浩，吕达，陈飞，宋家才，韩金柯，张宇，等.地面沉降对燃气管道安全影响研究[J].油气田地面工程，2022，41（11）：71-79. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1006-6896.2022.11.014.

ZHANG H, LYU D, CHEN F, SONG J C, HAN J K, ZHANG Y, et al. Research on influence of land subsidence on gas pipeline safety[J]. Oil-Gas Field Surface Engineering, 2022, 41(11): 71-79.

[4] 茹瑞英.玻璃钢管道在某油田注水系统中的应用[J].工业用水与废水，2022，53（4）：51-54. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1009-2455.2022.04.011.

RU R Y. Application of GRE pipe in an oilfield water injection system[J]. Industrial Water & Wastewater, 2022, 53(4): 51-54.

[5] 刘鹏，黄维和，李玉星，孙明源，张宇，张炎.连续塌陷下埋地钢管力学响应研究[J].油气储运，2021，40（9）：1017-1026. DOI：10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.09.007.

LIU P, HUANG W H, LI Y X, SUN M Y, ZHANG Y, ZHANG Y. Research on mechanical response of buried steel pipelines under continuous collapse[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2021, 40(9): 1017-1026.

[6] 刘鹏，李玉星，张宇，孙明源，张玉，张炎.典型地质灾害下埋地管道的应力计算[J].油气储运，2021，40（2）：157-165. DOI：10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.02.006.

LIU P, LI Y X, ZHANG Y, SUN M Y, ZHANG Y, ZHANG Y. Stress calculation of buried pipelines affected by typical geological hazards[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2021, 40(2): 157-165.

[7] YU C, HAN C J, XIE R, WANG L. Mechanical behavior analysis of buried pipeline under stratum settlement caused by underground mining[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2020, 188: 104212. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104212.

[8] ZHANG J, XIE R, ZHENG T, LU G H, XU J Y. Buckling behavior of buried pipe crossing stratum subsidence area[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2022, 135: 106130. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106130.

[9] 宋来福，王伟，应豪，范宁，蔡国桢，邹毅，等.不均匀沉降作用下混凝土管涵沉降预测及可靠度分析[J].安全与环境学报，2024，24（2）：496-502. DOI：10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2022.2735.

SONG L F, WANG W, YING H, FAN N, CAI G Z, ZOU Y, et al. Settlement prediction and reliability analysis of concrete pipe culvert under uneven settlement[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2024, 24(2): 496-502.

[10] ORUJI S, KETABDAR M, MOON D, TSAO V, KETABDAR M. Evaluation of land subsidence hazard on steel natural gas pipelines in California[J]. Upstream Oil and Gas Technology, 2022, 8: 100062. DOI: 10.1016/j.upstre.2021.100062.

[11] 殷鹰，蓝朝逊，李俊，毛丹，史君林.埋地PE燃气管道地质沉降破坏数值分析[J].中国安全科学学报，2019，29（10）：18-23. DOI：10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2019.10.004.

YIN Y, LAN C X, LI J, MAO D, SHI J L. Numerical analysis of geological settlement failure of buried PE gas pipeline[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2019, 29(10): 18-23.

[12] WU Y, YOU X, ZHA S X. Mechanical behavior analysis of buried polyethylene pipe under land subsidence[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2020, 108: 104351. DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.104351.

[13] ZHA S X, LAN H Q. Fracture behavior of pre-cracked polyethylene gas pipe under foundation settlement by extended finite element method[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2021, 189: 104270. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104270.

[14] 许华明.地基沉降对埋地玻璃钢管道的破坏性研究[J].纤维复合材料，2020，37（3）：83-86. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1003-6423.2020.03.017.

XU H M. Study on the damage of ground settlement to the buried GRP pipeline[J]. Fiber Composites, 2020, 37(3): 83-86.

[15] 王浩，王宁.高压玻璃钢管道的性能特点及应用[J].石油和化工设备，2021，24（4）：82-84.

WANG H, WANG N. Performance characteristics and application of high pressure FRP pipeline[J]. Petro-Chemical Equipment, 2021, 24(4): 82-84.

[16] SOVEITI S, MOSALMANI R. Mechanical behavior of buried composite pipelines subjected to strike-slip fault movement[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 135: 106195. DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106195.

[17] 马小明，詹迪.非均匀沉降下沿海天然气埋地管道安全运行分析[J].化工机械，2023，50（1）：76-82. DOI：10.20031/j.cnki.0254-6094.202301012.

MA X M, ZHAN D. Analysis of safe operation of buried coastal natural gas pipelines under non-uniform settlement[J]. Chemical Engineering & Machinery, 2023, 50(1): 76-82.

[18] VAZOURAS P, KARAMANOS S A, DAKOULAS P. Finite element analysis of buried steel pipelines under strike-slip fault displacements[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 30(11): 1361-1376. DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.011.

[19] 段佳利.埋地玻璃钢夹砂管道力学性能的数值模拟[D].重庆：重庆大学，2013.

DUAN J L. Numerical simulation on the mechanical properties of buried GRP pipe[D]. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2013.

[20] NAIK N K, SEKHER Y C, MEDURI S. Polymer matrix woven fabric composites subjected to low velocity impact: part I-damage initiation studies[J]. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 2000, 19(12): 912-954. DOI: 10.1106/X80M-4UEF-CPPK-M15E.

[21] 赵士成，王振清，郭建明，杨斌.混杂方式对CF/GF/环氧混杂复合材料低速冲击性能的影响[J].哈尔滨工程大学学报，2015，36（11）：1476-1480. DOI：10.11990/jheu.201410061.

ZHAO S C, WANG Z Q, GUO J M, YANG B. Effect of hybrid style on the performance of CF/GF/epoxy hybrid composites subjected to low-velocity impact[J]. Journal of Harbin Engineering University, 2015, 36(11): 1476-1480.

[22] 李响，贾欲明，洪润民.Hashin准则的应力应变形式在复合材料渐进损伤计算中的对比[J].机械工程学报，2022，58（22）：284-293. DOI：10.3901/JME.2022.22.284.

LI X, JIA Y M, HONG R M. Comparison between the stress form and strain form of Hashin criteria in progressive failure analysis of composite materials[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2022, 58(22): 284-293.

[23] LAPCZYK I, HURTADO J A. Progressive damage modeling in fiber-reinforced materials[J]. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 2007, 38(11): 2333-2341. DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.017.

[24] 王鹰宇.Abaqus分析用户手册-材料卷[M].北京：机械工业出版社，2018：352.

WANG Y Y. Abaqus analysis user’s guide: materials volume[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2018: 352.

[25] CAMANHO P P, MATTHEWS F L. A progressive damage model for mechanically fastened joints in composite laminates[J]. Journal of Composite Materials, 1999, 33(24): 2248-2280. DOI: 10.1177/002199839903302402.

[26] 张杰，梁政，韩传军，张瀚.地层塌陷作用下埋地管道应变响应分析[J].失效分析与预防，2018，13（1）：19-24. DOI：10.3969/j.issn.1673-6214.2018.01.004.

ZHANG J, LIANG Z, HAN C J, ZHANG H. Strain analysis of buried pipeline under strata subsidence[J]. Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2018, 13(1): 19-24.

[27] TSINIDIS G, DI SARNO L, SEXTOS A, FURTNER P. A critical review on the vulnerability assessment of natural gas pipelines subjected to seismic wave propagation. Part 2: Pipe analysis aspects[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2019, 92: 103056. DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2019.103056.

[28] FANG P, XU Y X, GAO Y F, ALI L, BAI Y. Mechanical responses of a fiberglass flexible pipe subject to tension & internal pressure[J]. Thin-Walled Structures, 2022, 181: 110107. DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2022.110107.

相似文献/References:

[1]张笑影,马晓红,王聪,等.地质沉降作用下埋地玻璃钢管道的力学行为[J].油气储运,2024,43(07):769.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.07.006]
　ZHANG Xiaoying,MA Xiaohong,WANG Cong,et al.Study on mechanical behaviors of buried FRP pipeline under geological sedimentation[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2024,43(06):769.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.07.006]

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-04-11