PDF下载
[1]王炎兵,石彤,刘海春,等.纵向连续冷弯管管段沉管下沟的可行性[J].油气储运,2024,43(08):936-943.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.08.010]
　WANG Yanbing,SHI Tong,LIU Haichun,et al.Feasibility of lowering-in of longitudinally continuous cold-bends[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2024,43(08):936-943.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.08.010]
点击复制

纵向连续冷弯管管段沉管下沟的可行性

《油气储运》[ISSN:1000-8241/CN:13-1093/TE] 卷: 43 期数: 2024年08期 页码: 936-943 栏目: 工艺与工程 出版日期: 2024-08-25
Title:
Feasibility of lowering-in of longitudinally continuous cold-bends
文章编号:
1000-8241（2024）08-0936-08
作者:
王炎兵1; 石彤1; 刘海春2; 赵一桦3; 董秦龙2; 沙胜义2; 卜明哲2; 张宏1; 王昊1
1.中国石油大学（北京）·油气管道输送安全国家工程研究中心·石油工程教育部重点实验室·城市油气输配技术北京市重点实验室;2.国家石油天然气管网集团有限公司;3.长庆油田第一采气厂连续冷弯管
Author(s):
WANG Yanbing1; SHI Tong1; LIU Haichun2; ZHAO Yihua3; DONG Qinlong2; SHA Shengyi2; BU Mingzhe2; ZHANG Hong1; WANG Hao1
1.China University of Petroleum (Beijing)//National Engineering Research Center for Pipeline Safety//MOE Key Laboratory of Petroleum Engineering//Beijing Key Laboratory of Urban Oil and Gas Distribution Technology;2.China Oil and Gas Pipeline Network Corp
关键词:
连续冷弯管; 沉管; 下沟深度; 冷弯角度; 最大应力
Keywords:
continuous cold bends;  lowering-in;  lowering depth;  angle of cold bends;  maximum stress
分类号:
TE88
DOI:
10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.08.010
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【目的】沉管下沟是管道埋地敷设的主要方式之一，用连续冷弯管代替热煨弯头可以实现埋地管道纵向转弯，管道的最大应力是评判纵向连续冷弯管沉管下沟安全施工的关键指标。【方法】选取管径1219mm、壁厚22mm的X80管道为例，采用有限元方法建立纵向连续冷弯管管段沉管下沟数值模型，分析下沟过程中管道应力的变化规律，探讨下沟深度、连续冷弯角度、管沟开挖方向等对管道应力的影响。【结果】连续冷弯管的存在会加大下沟过程中管道的最大应力，且最大应力位置位于冷弯管起始边界附近；下沟过程中，管道上坡、下坡时产生的最大应力分别为压应力、拉应力，且同一上坡、下坡角度下的两种应力绝对值基本相当；从坡面向平面进行管沟开挖将会加大管道最大应力，且管道应力随下沟深度、连续冷弯角度的增加而增大。通过对管径1219mm、壁厚22mm的X80管道的纵向连续冷弯管沉管下沟应力进行计算，得出在冷弯角度26°、下沟深度5m内，管道的最大应力满足油气输送管道沉管下沟施工要求。为控制管道应力，可在冷弯管区域前、后100m范围内进行分层开挖。【结论】管道下沟过程中应力受多个沉管参数的影响，依据下沟过程中最大应力的变化趋势，采取有效的控制措施即可实现纵向转弯管道的连续冷弯管管段沉管下沟施工。（图6，表4，参24）
Abstract:
[Objective] Lowering-in is a primary method for underground pipeline laying. Continuous cold bends are utilized in place of hot-bending elbows at longitudinal turns along these buried pipelines. In this context, the maximum stress in the pipelines is considered a critical indicator for assessing safety when lowering longitudinally continuous cold bends into the trenches. [Methods] Taking X80 pipes with a diameter of 1 219 mm and wall thickness of 22 mm as an example, the Finite Element Method (FEM) was used to establish a numerical model for the lowering-in process of longitudinally continuous cold bends into the trench. The subsequent analysis focused on investigating the stress variations in the pipeline throughout the lowering-in process, aimed to discuss the impact of different factors such as lowering depth, angle of continuous cold bends, and the direction of trench excavation on pipeline stress levels. [Results] The presence of continuous cold bends resulted in an elevation of the maximum stress in the pipeline during the lowering-in operation, and the maximum stress was found near the initial boundary of the cold bends. In the lowering-in process, the pipeline’s maximum stress was identified as compressive stress on the uphill and tensile stress on the downhill, with nearly identical absolute values at equivalent gradients. Trench excavation from a slope transitioning into a level section caused an escalation in the pipeline’s maximum stress, directly correlating with increased lowering depths and angles of continuous cold bends. The stress calculations for longitudinal continuous cold bends constructed from X80 pipes with a diameter of 1 219 mm and wall thickness of 22 mm during the lowering-in process demonstrated that, at a turning angle of 26° and a lowering depth of 5 m, the resultant maximum stress in the pipeline complied with the established requirements for the lowering-in of oil and gas transmission pipelines. The implementation of layered excavation within a 100 m range preceding and following the cold bends was identified as an effective measure for managing pipeline stress levels. [Conclusion] Pipeline stress is influenced by multiple parameters during the lowering-in process. By analyzing the trends in maximum stress variation in this process, effective control measures can be employed to streamline the lowering-in of continuous cold bends at longitudinal pipeline turns. (6 Figures, 4 Tables, 24 References)

参考文献/References:

[1] 罗扬，齐建波，杨林，康凯，谌贵宇，葛华.浅析适应山区管道全自动焊的线路设计研究[J].天然气与石油，2023，41（1）：22-27. 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5539.2023.01.004. LUO Y, QI J B, YANG L, KANG K, SHEN G Y, GE H. Study on route design of pipelines in mountainous areas for full-position automatic welding[J]. Natural Gas and Oil, 2023, 41(1): 22-27.
[2] 赵洪元，高安翔.山区陡坡地段管道安装技术[J].石油工程建设， 2018，44（4）：51-54. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2206.2018.04.012. ZHAO H Y, GAO A X. Installation techniques of pipelines in mountainous steep slope area[J]. Petroleum Engineering Construction, 2018, 44(4): 51-54.
[3] 舒均满.陕京四线冲沟地段管道任意角度连头技术应用[J].管道技术与设备，2018（4）：36-38. 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9614.2018.04.011. SHU J M. Application of arbitrary angle connection technology for pipeline in gully area of Shaanxi-Beijing Four Pipes[J]. Pipeline Technique and Equipment, 2018(4): 36-38.
[4] 赵赏鑫.油气长输管道工程自动焊施工的技术准备要点[J].油气储运，2021，40（12）：1409-1415. 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241. 2021.12.012. ZHAO S X. Key points of technical preparation for automatic welding of long-distance oil and gas pipelines[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2021, 40(12): 1409-1415.
[5] 隋永莉，王鹏宇.中俄东线天然气管道黑河—长岭段环焊缝焊接工艺[J].油气储运，2020，39（9）：961-970. 10.6047/j.issn. 1000-8241.2020.09.001. SUI Y L, WANG P Y. Girth welding technology used in Heihe-Changling Section of China-Russia Eastern Gas Pipeline[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2020, 39(9): 961-970.
[6] SEN M, ZHOU J. Evaluation of pipeline stresses during line lowering[C]. Calgary: 2008 7th International Pipeline Conference, 2008: 213-221.
[7] 季蓓蕾，刘啸奔，江金旭，易斐宁，武学健，刘玉卿，等.软土沉降位移作用下大口径管道轴向应力状态研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2021，17（6）：85-90. 10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x. 2021.06.014. JI B L, LIU X B, JIANG J X, YI F N, WU X J, LIU Y Q, et al.Study on longitudinal stress state of large diameter pipeline under effect of soft soil settlement displacement[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2021, 17(6): 85-90.
[8] ZHANG Y, XIONG H X, ZHANG Z, WANG Y. A nonlinear analytical method for pipeline strain under soil thaw subsidence load in permafrost region[J/OL]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering: 212917[2024-04-09]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2024.212917. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoen.2024.212917.
[9] 王付会，练章华，林铁军.双侧沉管在水网地段应力分析及数值模拟[J].石油机械，2015，43（7）：116-120. 10.16082/j.cnki. issn.1001-4578.2015.07.026. WANG F H, LIAN Z H, LIN T J. Theoretical analysis and numerical simulation of pipeline stress with lowering pipeline on both sides in water network areas[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2015, 43(7): 116-120.
[10] 兰旭彬，杨雅冰，房茂立，赵连学，朱海瑞.沉管下沟管道力学分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术，2023，19（6）：112-118. 10.11731/j.issn.1673-193x.2023.06.016. LAN X B, YANG Y B, FANG M L, ZHAO L X, ZHU H R. Mechanical analysis on immersed ditching pipeline[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2023, 19(6): 112-118.
[11] 康万平，王宇，李战宏.沉管技术在长输管道河谷段的施工应用[J]. 油气储运，2010，29（7）：550-552. 10.6047/j.issn. 1000-8241.2010.07.022. KANG W P, WANG Y, LI Z H. Application of pipe sinking technique in valley pipeline construction[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2010, 29(7): 550-552.
[12] 夏梦莹，张宏，吴锴，吴经天.海底管道后挖沟过程的应力解析分析方法[J].石油管材与仪器，2017，3（6）：41-43. 10.19459/j.cnki.61-1500/te.2017.06.011. XIA M Y, ZHANG H, WU K, WU J T. Analytical stress analysis method for submarine pipeline during trenching[J]. Petroleum Tubular Goods & Instruments, 2017, 3(6): 41-43.
[13] DUAN D M, JURCA T, ZHOU C. A stress check procedure for pipe lowering-in process during pipeline construction[C]. Calgary: 2014 10th International Pipeline Conference, 2014:V001T03A006.
[14] 谷青悦，刘纯婧，林智敏.长输管道沉管下沟过程应力分析[J].石油工程建设，2019，45（2）：16-19. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2206. 2019.02.004. GU Q Y, LIU C J, LIN Z M. Stress analysis of sinking pipeline into trench for long distance pipeline[J]. Petroleum Engineering Construction, 2019, 45(2): 16-19.
[15] 刘玉卿，武玉梁，张振永.中俄东线水平连续冷弯管管道沉管下沟的可行性[J].油气储运，2020，39（2）：215-221. 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2020.02.013. LIU Y Q, WU Y L, ZHANG Z Y. Feasibility of lowering-in of horizontal continuous cold bending pipes in China–Russia Eastern Gas Pipeline[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2020, 39(2): 215-221.
[16] 刘玉卿，余志峰，齐万鹏.中俄东线天然气管道沉管下沟数值模拟[J].石油机械，2019，47（3）：118-123. 10.16082/j.cnki. issn.1001-4578.2019.03.020. LIU Y Q, YU Z F, QI W P. Numerical simulation of sinking and lowering of China-Russia Eastern Gas Pipeline[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2019, 47(3): 118-123.
[17] 张振永.中俄东线X80钢级Φ1 422 mm管道工程设计关键技术应用[J].焊管，2019，42（7）：64-71. 10.19291/j.cnki. 1001-3938.2019.7.007. ZHANG Z Y. Application of key technologies in design of X80 Φ1 422 mm pipeline engineering of China-Russia East Natural Gas Pipeline Project[J]. Welded Pipe and Tube, 2019, 42(7): 64-71.
[18] LIU M, WANG Y Y, ROGERS G. Stress analysis of pipe lowering-in process during construction[C]. Calgary: 2008 7th International Pipeline Conference, 2008: 223-228.
[19] 刘宇，高广林，冯斌，王双喜.油气管道冷弯管的技术发展现状[J]. 油气储运，2015，34（6）：580-585. 10.6047/j.issn. 1000-8241.2015.06.003. LIU Y, GAO G L, FENG B, WANG S X. Current situation of the pipe cold bending for oil and gas pipelines[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2015, 34(6): 580-585.
[20] 张宏，刘啸奔.地质灾害作用下油气管道设计应变计算模型[J]. 油气储运，2017，36（1）：91-97. 10.6047/j.issn. 1000-8241.2017.01.012. ZHANG H, LIU X B. Design strain calculation model for oil and gas pipelines subject to geological hazards[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2017, 36(1): 91-97.
[21] ZHANG F, LIU M, WANG Y Y. Stress analysis of lifting and lowering-in process[C]. Calgary: 2014 10th International Pipeline Conference, 2014: V001T03A012.
[22] 何少炜，王学，陆鹏州.大陡坡段山地油气管道安全施工技术研究[J].中国储运，2022（7）：122-123. 10.16301/j.cnki.cn12-1204/f.2022.07.079. HE S W, WANG X, LU P Z. Study on safe construction technology of mountain oil and gas pipeline in steep slope section[J]. China Storage & Transport, 2022(7): 122-123.
[23] 梁国俭，姚道玉.大口径管道陡坡段坡顶全自动焊接预制及溜管下沟施工方法[J].石油工程建设，2021，47（5）：61-66. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2206.2021.05.013. LIANG G J, YAO D Y. Construction method of fully automatic welding prefabrication on slope top then sliding into trench for steep slope section of large-diameter pipeline[J]. Petroleum Engineering Construction, 2021, 47(5): 61-66.
[24] 尹铁，赵弘，张倩，吴婷婷，周伦，王新升.长输油气管道焊接机器人的技术现状与发展趋势[J].石油科学通报，2021，6（1）：145-157. 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1693.2021.01.012. YIN T, ZHAO H, ZHANG Q, WU T T, ZHOU L, WANG X S. Current situation and development of welding robots for long distance oil and gas pipelines[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2021, 6(1): 145-157.

相似文献/References:

[1]康万平,王宇,李战宏.沉管技术在长输管道河谷段的施工应用[J].油气储运,2010,29(7):550.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2010.07.022]
　Kang Wanping,Wang Yu,Li Zhanhong.Application of Pipe Sinking Technique in Valley Pipeline Construction[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2010,29(08):550.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2010.07.022]
[2]李志勇,朱东志,赵海宴,等.冀宁管道大汶河穿越带水开挖施工技术[J].油气储运,2007,26(4):35.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2007.04.010]
　LI Zhiyong,ZHU Dongzhi.Underwater Open-cut Crossing Technology to Cross Dawen River of Ji’ning Gas Transmission Pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2007,26(08):35.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2007.04.010]
[3]杜景水,陈次昌,王健,等.兰成渝输油管道沉管应力应变监测技术[J].油气储运,2009,28(11):69.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2009.11.019]
　DU Jingshui,CHEN Cichang.Stress-strain Monitoring Technique for Relaying Pipe Section over Lanzhou-Chengdu-Chongqing Oil Product Pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2009,28(08):69.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2009.11.019]
[4]张军宏,沈军.沉管技术在中沧输气管道保护中的应用[J].油气储运,2005,24(11):36.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2005.11.010]
　ZHANG Junhong,SHEN Jun.The Application of Re-lowering in Technology of Pipeline Section in Zhongyuan Oilfield-Cangzhou Gas Transmission Pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2005,24(08):36.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2005.11.010]
[5]刘玉卿　武玉梁　张振永.中俄东线水平连续冷弯管管道沉管下沟的可行性[J].油气储运,2019,38(12):1.
　LIU Yuqing,WU Yuliang,ZHANG Zhenyong.Feasibility of lowering-in of horizontal continuous cold bending pipes in China–Russia Eastern Gas Pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2019,38(08):1.
[6]刘玉卿　武玉梁　张振永.中俄东线水平连续冷弯管管道沉管下沟的可行性[J].油气储运,2020,39(02):215.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2020.02.013]
　LIU Yuqing,WU Yuliang,ZHANG Zhenyong.Feasibility of lowering-in of horizontal continuous cold bending pipes in China–Russia Eastern Gas Pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2020,39(08):215.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2020.02.013]
[7]王炎兵,石彤,刘海春,等.纵向连续冷弯管管段沉管下沟的可行性[J].油气储运,2024,43(07):1.
　WANG Yanbing,SHI Tong,Liu Haichun,et al.Feasibility of lowering-in of vertical continuous cold bend pipes[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2024,43(08):1.

备注/Memo

基金项目：国家重点研发计划“中俄管道重大风险防控与安全保障关键技术”，2022YFC3070100；国家自然科学基金资助项目“逆断层作用下X80管道屈曲演化与韧性破损机理研究”，52004314；北京市科协“青年人才托举工程”项目“高钢级管道环焊缝可靠性评价方法研究”，BYESS2023261；国家管网集团科学研究与技术开发项目“高钢级管道环焊缝失效机理研究”，WZXGL202105；国家管网集团科学研究与技术开发项目“高钢级管道环焊缝缺陷检测评价技术研究”，WZXGL202104；中国石油大学（北京）科研基金项目“掺氢管道环焊缝失效机理与评价方法研究”，2462023BJRC005。
作者简介：王炎兵，男，2000年生，在读硕士生，2022年毕业于中国石油大学（北京）油气储运工程专业，现主要从事油气储运设施安全与完整性管理方向的研究工作。地址：北京市昌平区府学路18号， 102249。电话：13591188127。Email：wangyb4127@163.com
通信作者：王昊，男，1991年生，讲师，2019年博士毕业于美国普渡大学航空航天工程专业，现主要从事油气管道结构安全与适用性评价的相关研究。地址：北京市昌平区府学路18号，102249。电话：010-89731239。Email：hao.wang.37@cup.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-08-20