PDF下载
[1]方益涛,谭海川,唐亮,等.海底掺氢天然气管道的泄漏扩散模拟[J].油气储运,2024,43(08):877-886.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.08.004]
　FANG Yitao,TAN Haichuan,TANG Liang,et al.Leakage and diffusion simulation of submarine hydrogen-blended natural gas pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2024,43(08):877-886.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.08.004]
点击复制

海底掺氢天然气管道的泄漏扩散模拟

《油气储运》[ISSN:1000-8241/CN:13-1093/TE] 卷: 43 期数: 2024年08期 页码: 877-886 栏目: 低碳与新能源 出版日期: 2024-08-25
Title:
Leakage and diffusion simulation of submarine hydrogen-blended natural gas pipeline
文章编号:
1000-8241（2024）08-0877-10
作者:
方益涛1; 谭海川1; 唐亮1; 王孟杰2; 李敬法2; 苏越3
1.深港天然气管道有限公司;2.北京石油化工学院机械工程学院;3.中国石油大学（北京）机械与储运工程学院
Author(s):
FANG Yitao1; TAN Haichuan1; TANG Liang1; WANG Mengjie2; LI Jingfa2; SU Yue3
1.Shengang Natural Gas Pipeline Co. Ltd.;2.School of Mechanical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Petrochemical Technology;3.College of Mechanical and Transportation Engineering, China University of Petroleum (Beijing)
关键词:
海底管道; 天然气; 掺氢输送; 泄漏; 扩散; 数值模拟
Keywords:
submarine pipeline;  natural gas;  hydrogen-blended natural gas transmission;  leakage;  diffusion;  numerical simulation
分类号:
TE88
DOI:
10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2024.08.004
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
【目的】泄漏是海底天然气管道最常见的安全事故，当采用海底天然气管道进行掺氢输送时，研究掺氢对海底天然气泄漏扩散演化过程的影响具有重要意义。【方法】采用数值模拟方法，分别对海底掺氢天然气管道的锚断泄漏与小孔泄漏两种典型泄漏场景进行研究，分析掺氢比、海水深度、管道埋深、泄漏孔径等关键因素对掺氢天然气泄漏扩散的影响规律。【结果】对于海底掺氢天然气管道，无论是锚断泄漏还是小孔泄漏，海水流速均会影响掺氢天然气沿水平及竖直方向的扩散距离。对于海底管道锚断泄漏，掺氢比的增加会增大泄漏掺氢天然气在海水中的扩散速率，相同泄漏时间下掺氢天然气沿水平及竖直方向的扩散距离均会比纯天然气增加；泄漏的掺氢天然气溢出海面的时间与管道埋深正相关，管道在海床中埋设越深，掺氢天然气溢出海面所需的时间越长。对于海底管道小孔泄漏，泄漏的掺氢天然气由于受海床泥沙阻力的影响，扩散过程相对锚断泄漏变缓，掺氢比的增加同样会增大掺氢天然气沿水平及竖直方向的扩散距离；泄漏孔径的尺寸对泄漏扩散影响明显，随着泄漏孔径的增大，相同泄漏时间下掺氢天然气的扩散距离增加。【结论】相关研究可为海底掺氢天然气管道的安全输送与泄漏防护提供参考。（图12，表5，参29）
Abstract:
[Objective] Among various safety accidents associated with submarine natural gas pipelines, leakage remains a prevalent concern due to its high frequency. As the transmission of hydrogen-blended natural gas becomes more common through these pipelines, studying the impact of hydrogen blending on the evolution of leakage and diffusion is of utmost importance. [Methods] Two typical leakage scenarios of submarine hydrogen-blended natural gas pipelines were studied through numerical simulations:anchor break leakage and aperture leakage. The analysis focused on the influence patterns of crucial factors such as hydrogen blending ratios, seawater depths, pipeline burial depths, and sizes of leakage apertures on the leakage and diffusion of these pipelines. [Results] In both anchor break leakage and aperture leakage scenarios of submarine hydrogen-blended natural gas pipelines, it was observed that seawater velocity influenced the horizontal and vertical diffusion distances of leaking hydrogen-blended natural gas. In the anchor break leakage scenario, the diffusion of leaking hydrogen-blended natural gas in seawater accelerated with a rise in the hydrogen blending ratio. This led to greater horizontal and vertical diffusion distances for leaking hydrogen-blended natural gas compared to pure natural gas within the same leakage duration. Additionally, a direct correlation was noted between the time taken for leaking hydrogen-blended natural gas to reach the sea surface and the pipeline burial depth. Deeper pipeline burial depths led to longer travel times for leaking hydrogen-blended natural gas to reach the sea surface. In the aperture leakage scenarios, the diffusion process of leaking hydrogen-blended natural gas exhibited a deceleration compared to anchor break leakage, primarily attributed to the resistance posed by seabed sediment. Furthermore, an increase in the hydrogen blending ratio also resulted in extended horizontal and vertical diffusion distances of leaking hydrogen-blended natural gas. Notably, a distinct impact on leakage diffusion was identified across varying leakage aperture sizes. Larger leakage apertures allowed leaking hydrogen-blended natural gas to diffuse over greater distances within the same leakage duration. [Conclusion] The research findings serve as a reference for enhancing the safety of transmission and preventing leakage in submarine hydrogen-blended natural gas pipelines. (12 Figures, 5 Tables, 29 References)

参考文献/References:

[1] 邹才能，李建明，张茜，金旭，熊波，余晖迪，等.氢能工业现状、技术进展、挑战及前景[J].天然气工业，2022，42（4）：1-20. 10. 3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2022.04.001. ZOU C N, LI J M, ZHANG Q, JIN X, XIONG B, YU H D, et al. Industrial status, technological progress, challenges and prospects of hydrogen energy[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(4): 1-20.
[2] 孟翔宇，陈铭韵，顾阿伦，邬新国，刘滨，周剑，等.“双碳”目标下中国氢能发展战略[J].天然气工业，2022，42（4）：156-179. 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2022.04.015. MENG X Y, CHEN M Y, GU A L, WU X G, LIU B, ZHOU J, et al. China’s hydrogen development strategy in the context of double carbon targets[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(4):156-179.
[3] 张庆生，黄雪松.国内外氢能产业政策与技术经济性分析[J].低碳化学与化工，2023，48（2）：133-139. 10.3969/j.issn. 1001-9219.2023.02.017. ZHANG Q S, HUANG X S. Analysis of domestic and foreign hydrogen energy industrial policies and technical economy[J]. Low-Carbon Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 2023, 48(2):133-139.
[4] 李敬法，李建立，王玉生，赵杰，李汉勇，宇波.氢能储运关键技术研究进展及发展趋势探讨[J].油气储运，2023，42（8）：856-871. 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2023.08.002. LI J F, LI J L, WANG Y S, ZHAO J, LI H Y, YU B. Research progress and development trends of key technologies for hydrogen energy storage and transportation[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2023, 42(8): 856-871.
[5] 刘翠伟，裴业斌，韩辉，周慧，张睿，李玉星，等.氢能产业链及储运技术研究现状与发展趋势[J].油气储运，2022，41（5）：498-514. 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.05.002. LIU C W, PEI Y B, HAN H, ZHOU H, ZHANG R, LI Y X, et al. Research status and development trend of hydrogen energy industry chain and the storage and transportation technologies[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2022, 41(5): 498-514.
[6] 丁镠，唐涛，王耀萱，康宁，许鑫.氢储运技术研究进展与发展趋势[J].天然气化工（C1化学与化工），2022，47（2）：35-40. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9219.2022.02.005. DING L, TANG T, WANG Y X, KANG N, XU X. Research progress and development trend of hydrogen storage and transportation technology[J]. Natural Gas Chemical Industry, 2022, 47(2): 35-40.
[7] 曹军文，覃祥富，耿嘎，张文强，于波.氢气储运技术的发展现状与展望[J].石油学报（石油加工），2021，37（6）：1461-1478. 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8719.2021.06.026. CAO J W, QIN X F, GENG G, ZHANG W Q, YU B. Current status and prospects of hydrogen storage and transportation technology[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica (Petroleum Processing Section), 2021, 37(6): 1461-1478.
[8] 李敬法，苏越，张衡，宇波.掺氢天然气管道输送研究进展[J].天然气工业，2021，41（4）：137-152. 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2021.04.015. LI J F, SU Y, ZHANG H, YU B. Research progresses on pipeline transportation of hydrogen-blended natural gas[J].Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(4): 137-152.
[9] 王玮，王秋岩，邓海全，程光旭，李云.天然气管道输送混氢天然气的可行性[J].天然气工业，2020，40（3）：130-136. 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2020.03.016. WANG W, WANG Q Y, DENG H Q, CHENG G X, LI Y. Feasibility analysis on the transportation of hydrogen-natural gas mixtures in natural gas pipelines[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(3): 130-136.
[10] 高岳，朱红钧，唐堂，李佳男，陈泉宇，刘文丽.天然气管道掺氢输送研究现状与分析[J].低碳化学与化工，2024，49（3）：118-128. 10.12434/j.issn.2097-2547.20230260. GAO Y, ZHU H J, TANG T, LI J N, CHEN Q Y, LIU W L. Research status and analysis of hydrogen-blended natural gas transportation in natural gas pipelines[J]. Low-Carbon Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 2024, 49(3): 118-128.
[11] 张家俊，国丽萍.氢能管道输送技术最新进展[J/OL].化工进展：1-9[2024-03-07]. https://doi.org/10.16085/j.issn. 1000-6613.2023-2164. 10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613. 2023-2164. ZHANG J J, GUO L P. Latest progress in hydrogen pipeline transportation technology[J/OL]. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress: 1-9[2024-03-07]. https://doi. org/10.16085/j.issn.1000-6613.2023-2164.
[12] 李又绿，姚安林，李永杰.天然气管道泄漏扩散模型研究[J].天然气工业，2004，24（8）：102-104. 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976. 2004.08.033. LI Y L, YAO A L, LI Y J. Study on diffusion model of gas pipeline leaking[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2004, 24(8): 102-104.
[13] 梁浩，李海川，郝兴国，葛彤.海底管道失效原因及基于ROV的海底管道巡检技术[J].油气储运，2015，34（4）：439-441. 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2015.04.021. LIANG H, LI H C, HAO X G, GE T. Reasons for subsea pipeline failure and ROV-based inspection technology of subsea pipeline[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2015, 34(4):439-441.
[14] OLSEN J E, SKJETNE P. Current understanding of subsea gas release: a review[J]. The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2016, 94(2): 209-219. DOI: 10.1002/cjce.22345.
[15] 李新宏，朱红卫，陈国明，孟祥坤.海底管道泄漏天然气扩散规律数值模拟[J].油气储运，2016，35（2）：215-220. 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2016.02.019.LI X H, ZHU H W, CHEN G M, MENG X K. Numerical simulation on the gas diffusion law due to leakage of submarine pipeline[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2016, 35(2):215-220.
[16] 李延豪，侯磊，于巧燕，柴冲，肖开喜.浅海天然气管道泄漏扩散过程模拟研究[J].石油化工高等学校学报，2022，35（2）：74-80. 10.3969/j.issn.1006-396X.2022.02.012. LI Y H, HOU L, YU Q Y, CHAI C, XIAO K X. Simulation study of leakage and diffusion of shallow subsea natural gas pipeline[J]. Journal of Petrochemical Universities, 2022, 35(2):74-80.
[17] 邓程鹏.海底天然气管道泄漏扩散规律分析[D].抚顺：辽宁石油化工大学，2019. DENG C P. Analysis of leakage and diffusion law of submarine natural gas pipeline[D]. Fushun: Liaoning Petrochemical University, 2019.
[18] 唐成.浅海输气管道泄漏数值模拟及后果研究[D].成都：西南石油大学，2019. TANG C. Numerical simulation and consequences study of gas pipeline leakage in shallow sea[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2019.
[19] 王少雄.输气管道水下天然气泄漏扩散特性研究[D].青岛：中国石油大学（华东），2020. WANG S X. Research on leakage and diffusion characteristics of underwater natural gas pipelines[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2020.
[20] 王靖雯.海底天然气管道泄漏预测及风险评估方法研究[D].西安：西安建筑科技大学，2023. WANG J W. Research on leak prediction and risk assessment method of subsea gas pipeline[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, 2023.
[21] SU Y, LI J F, YU B, ZHAO Y L. Numerical investigation on the leakage and diffusion characteristics of hydrogen-blended natural gas in a domestic kitchen[J]. Renewable Energy, 2022, 189: 899-916. DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.03.038.
[22] SU Y, LI J F, YU B, ZHAO Y L, HAN D X, SUN D L. Modeling of hydrogen blending on the leakage and diffusion of urban buried hydrogen-enriched natural gas pipeline[J]. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2023, 136(2):1315-1337. DOI: 10.32604/cmes.2023.026035.
[23] 孙齐，李凤，王一玮，董绍华，陈林，张行.掺氢天然气管道泄漏扩散规律及监测探头布设方案[J].油气储运，2022，41（8）：916-923. 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2022.08.006. SUN Q, LI F, WANG Y W, DONG S H, CHEN L, ZHANG H. Leakage diffusion law of hydrogen-mixed natural gas pipeline and layout plan of detectors[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2022, 41(8): 916-923.
[24] 胡玮鹏，陈光，齐宝金，张永海.埋地纯氢/掺氢天然气管道泄漏扩散数值模拟[J].油气储运，2023，42（10）：1118-1127，1136. 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2023.10.005. HU W P, CHEN G, QI B J, ZHANG Y H. Numerical simulation of leakage and diffusion of buried pure hydrogen/hydrogen-doped natural gas pipeline[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2023, 42(10): 1118-1127, 1136.
[25] 刘刚，王鑫，陈铎，黄镜溢，班久庆，杨威.土壤性质对掺氢天然气管道泄漏规律的影响[J/OL].石油与天然气化工：1-15 [2024-03-07]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/51.1210. TE.20240325.1606.002.html. LIU G, WANG X, CHEN D, HUANG J Y, BAN J Q, YANG W. The influence of Soil properties on the leakage law of hydrogen doped natural gas pipeline[J/OL]. Chemical Engineering of Oil & Gas: 1-15[2024-03-07]. http://kns.cnki. net/kcms/detail/51.1210.TE.20240325.1606.002.html.
[26] 高标，赵若彤，郐楚婷，胡梦玉，王国付.高压掺氢天然气管道泄漏扩散与失效后果的数值模拟研究[J].辽宁石油化工大学学报，2023，43（2）：60-66. 10.12422/j.issn.1672-6952.2023. 02.010. GAO B, ZHAO R T, KUAI C T, HU M Y, WANG G F. Numerical simulation of leak diffusion and failure consequences of high-pressure hydrogen-doped natural gas pipelines[J]. Journal of Liaoning Petrochemical University, 2023, 43(2): 60-66.
[27] 彭善碧，罗雪，杨林.掺氢天然气长输管道泄漏扩散规律数值模拟[J].石油与天然气化工，2023，52（6）：44-52，59. 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3426.2023.06.007. PENG S B, LUO X, YANG L. Numerical simulation of leakage and diffusion rules of hydrogen blended natural gas long-distance transportation pipelines[J]. Chemical Engineering of Oil and Gas, 2023, 52(6): 44-52, 59.
[28] 段鹏飞，张进盛，常曦文，韩辉，刘翠伟，刘建辉，等.掺氢天然气在管廊中的泄漏扩散特性[J].油气储运，2023，42（8）：901-909. 10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2023.08.006. DUAN P F, ZHANG J S, CHANG X W, HAN H, LIU C W, LIU J H, et al. Leakage and diffusion characteristics of hydrogen enriched natural gas in utility tunnel[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2023, 42(8): 901-909.
[29] LIU X, WANG Y, LIANG Y J, LI J F. CFD analysis of leakage and diffusion characteristics in the buried hydrogen-blended natural gas pipeline[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 60: 354-368. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene. 2024.02.092.

相似文献/References:

[1]张伟,杨新明.浅水海底混输管道设计压力的确定方法[J].油气储运,2011,30(01):34.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.01.009]
　Zhang Wei and Yang Xinming.Determination method for the design pressure of offshore multiphase pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(08):34.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.01.009]
[2]商同林,张树华.旋转容积式流量计在天然气计量中的应用[J].油气储运,2011,30(01):63.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.01.017]
　Shang Tonglin and Zhang Shuhua.The application of rotational positive displacement flowmeter in natural gas metering[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(08):63.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.01.017]
[3]王玮,张晓萍,李明,等.管输天然气气质的相特性[J].油气储运,2011,30(06):423.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.06.005]
　Wang Wei,Zhang Xiaoping,Li Ming,et al.Investigation on phase behavior of the pipelining natural gas[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(08):423.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.06.005]
[4]党学博.海底管道腐蚀与剩余寿命的灰色预测[J].油气储运,2011,30(07):486.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.07.002]
　Dang Xuebo.Prediction of corrosion and residual life of submarine pipeline with grey theory[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(08):486.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.07.002]
[5]谢丽婉,陈国明,鞠少栋.信息不完全时的海底管道安全评价方法[J].油气储运,2011,30(07):508.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.07.008]
　Xie Liwan,Chen Guoming,Ju Shaodong.A method for submarine pipeline safety assessment under the incomplete information condition[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(08):508.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.07.008]
[6]陈晓源,谭羽非.地下储气库天然气泄漏损耗与动态监测判定[J].油气储运,2011,30(07):513.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.07.009]
　Chen Xiaoyuan and Tan Yufei.Gas leak loss and dynamic monitoring determination of underground gas storage[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(08):513.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.07.009]
[7]袁献忠,薛光,黄明军,等.天然气分输站的计量调压设计[J].油气储运,2011,30(07):528.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.07.013]
　Yuan Xianzhong,Xue Guang,Huang Mingjun,et al.Metering and pressure regulating design of gas offtake station[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(08):528.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.07.013]
[8]肖伟生,林敏,刘骁.天然气涡轮流量计的应用与故障分析[J].油气储运,2011,30(07):536.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.07.017]
　Xiao Weisheng,Lin Ming,Liu Xiao.Application of turbine flowmeter and failure analysis[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(08):536.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.07.017]
[9]王鹏,杜梦溪,匡远奇,等.北京油气调控中心运营水平测评体系[J].油气储运,2011,30(07):539.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.07.018]
　Wang Peng,Du Mengxi,Kuang Yuanqi,et al.Assessment system of operation level for PetroChina Oil & Gas Pipeline Control Center of Beijing[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(08):539.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.07.018]
[10]潘家华.我国天然气管道工业发展前景预测[J].油气储运,2011,30(08):601.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.08.001]
　Pan Jiahua.Prospect prediction of domestic natural gas pipeline industry[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2011,30(08):601.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2011.08.001]
[11]方益涛,谭海川,唐亮,等.海底掺氢天然气管道的泄漏扩散模拟[J].油气储运,2024,43(09):1.
　FANG Yitao,TAN Haichuan,TANG Liang,et al.Research on the Leakage and Diffusion Law of a Certain Submarine Hydrogen-Blended Natural Gas Pipeline[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2024,43(08):1.

备注/Memo

基金项目：国家自然科学基金项目“城镇掺氢燃气管道掺混/分层传质机理及高精度随动流量掺氢调控机制研究”，52372311；国家市场监督管理总局科技计划项目“天然气掺氢管道材料性能及检验技术研究”，2023MK123。
作者简介：方益涛，男，1989年生，工程师，2012年毕业于西南石油大学油气储运工程专业，现主要从事跨境海底管道管理方向的研究工作。地址：广东省深圳市福田区深南大道1006号深圳国际创新中心A栋22层西半层，518000。电话：18025337943。Email：584916534@qq.com
通信作者：李敬法，男，1990年生，副研究员，2017年博士毕业于中国石油大学（北京）油气储运工程专业，现主要从事氢能管道输送方向的研究工作。地址：北京市大兴区清源北路19号，102617。电话：18810114816。Email：lijingfa@bipt.edu.cn

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-08-20