版权所有@2014 《油气储运》杂志社 冀ICP备号:0000000
地址:河北省廊坊市金光道51号(065000);电话:0316-2177193 / 0316-2176753; 传真:0316-2177392; 网址:yqcy.paperonce.org
技术支持:西安三才科技实业有限公司 029-89381847;029-88222991
管道内检测数据对齐方法与应用
Alignment method of pipeline in-line inspection data and its application
in-line inspection data
; alignment; algorithm model; application test; mining and analysis随着内检测的不断推进,大部分管道已经开展了两轮及以上次数的内检测作业,获得了大量内检测数据。由于内检测受外部环境及检测误差的影响,多轮内检测数据在里程、缺陷识别与量化方面存在一定差异,难以实现多轮内检测数据的快速对齐,且人工对齐工作量巨大。为研究内检测数据的快速对齐方法,结合大量内检测数据,构建了内检测数据对齐算法模型,基于该模型实现了内检测数据的快速对齐,并通过不同单位、不同格式的内检测数据进行应用测试。测试结果表明:该方法可以实现管道阀门、三通等特征100%对齐,管节对齐比例达99%以上,弯头对齐比例达90%以上。基于该方法,可快速对内检测数据进行深度挖掘分析,预测管道本体缺陷发展趋势,为管道腐蚀控制及管道本体管理提供数据支撑,实现管道本体风险的预控,提高管道完整性管理水平。(图2,表8,参16)
With the continuous development of in-line inspection, two or more rounds of in-line inspection have been performed to most pipelines, and a large number of in-line inspection data are obtained. Due to the influence of external environment and detection error, the in-line inspection data in multiple rounds have deviations in mileage, defect identification and quantification, they are difficult to be aligned rapidly, and manual alignment is a huge workload. In order to study the rapid alignment method of in-line inspection data, an in-line inspection data alignment algorithm model was established based on the massive in-line inspection data, and with the model, the rapid alignment of in-line inspection data was realized, for which application test was conducted with the in-line inspection data of different units in different formats. The test results show that: the achievable alignment with this method is 100% for the features of pipeline valve and tee, over 99% for pipe joint and at least 90% for elbow. Further, based on the method, the inspection data could be quickly mined and analyzed in depth and the development trend of defects on pipe body could be predicted, so that data support could be provided for internal and external corrosion control and management of pipe body, the risks of pipe body could be pre-controlled, and the pipeline integrity management could be improved. (2 Figures, 8 Tables, 16 References)
[1] 林现喜,李银喜,周信,张克政.大数据环境下管道内检测数据管理[J].油气储运,2015,34(4):349-353. LIN X X, LI Y X, ZHOU X, ZHANG K Z. Management of inline inspection data of pipelines under the environment of big data[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2015, 34(4): 349-353.
[2] 宋汉成,冯庆善,王学力,梁绍辉.管道完整性评价软件及其应用[J].管道技术与设备,2012(6):4-6,23. SONG H C, FENG Q S, WANG X L, LIANG S H. Pipeline integrity assessment software and application[J]. Pipeline Technique and Equipment, 2012(6): 4-6, 23.
[3] 董绍华,刘立明.油气管道生产运行完整性(安全)评价及寿命预测理论与软件包开发研究[C].东营:全国油气储运技术交流研讨会,2002:254-267.DONG S H, LIU L M. Oil and gas pipeline operation integrity (safety) assessment and life prediction theory and software package development research[C]. Dongying: The National Oil and Gas Storage and transportation Technology Interchange Conference, 2002: 254-267.
[4] 李祎,周利剑,李振宁,欧新伟,宋世伟,谢芳. 基于内检测数据的管道完整性数据管理研究[C].西宁:中国油气管道安全运行与储存创新技术论坛,2010:596-599. LI Y, ZHOU L J, LI Z N, OU X W, SONG S W, XIE F. Pipeline integrity management research based on the inline inspection data[C]. Xining: Forum of Oil and Gas Pipeline Safety Operation and Storage Innovation Technology in China, 2010: 596-599.
[5] 姜晓红,洪险峰,刘争,张新荣,陈敏娟. 管道内检测数据对比对完整性评价的影响[J].油气储运,2016,35(1):28-31. JIANG X H, HONG X F, LIU Z, ZHANG X R, CHEN M J. Impacts of inline inspection data comparison on integrity assessment of pipelines[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2016, 35(1): 28-31.
[6] 杨贺,刘新凌,李强,梁菁嬿,于航.油气管道多轮内检测数据对齐算法研究及应用[J].管道技术与设备,2020(1):21-24,28. YANG H, LIU X L, LI Q, LIANG J Y, YU H. Research and application of alignment algorithm for multiple in-line inspection data of oil and gas pipeline[J]. Pipeline Technique and Equipment, 2020(1): 21-24, 28.
[7] GU B, KANIA R, SHARMA S, GAO M. Approach to assessment of corrosion growth in pipelines[C]. Calgary: 2002 4th International Pipeline Conference, 2002: 1837-1847.
[8] KARIYAWASAM S, WANG H. Learning from multiple corrosion growth rate (run comparison) studies[C]. Houston:Corrosion 2011, 2011: NACE-11303.
[9] DESJARDINS G, NICKLE R, SKIBINSKY D, YIP J. Comparison of in-line inspection service provider magnetic flux leakage (MFL) technology and analytical performance based on multiple runs on pipeline segment[C]. Calgary: 2012 9th International Pipeline Conference, 2012: 89-94.
[10] 腾延平,金良,高强,费雪松,南敬茹,刘志刚,等.高温原油管道内外检测数据比对分析[J].油气储运,2012,33(1):69-72. TENG Y P, JIN L, GAO Q, FEI X S, NAN J R, LIU Z G, et al. Comparative analysis between internal and external inspection data for high temperature crude oil pipeline[J]. Oil &Gas Storage and Transportation, 2012, 33(1): 69-72.
[11] 张鹏,蒲正元.管道缺陷漏磁和超声波检测数据的对比分析[J].中国安全科学学报,2014,24(10):113-119.ZHANG P, PU Z Y. Comparative analysis of magnetic and ultrasonic method data on defects in pipeline[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2014, 24(10): 113-119.
[12] 王丹丹,林晓,骆秀媛,詹燕红.海底管道两轮漏磁内检测数据的比对方法[J].船海工程,2016,45(3):122-126,130. WANG D D, LIN X, LUO X Y, ZHAN Y H. Comparison method of two magnetic flux leakage inspection data of submarine pipeline[J]. Ship & Ocean Engineering, 2016, 45(3):122-126, 130.
[13] 孙浩,帅健.长输管道内检测数据比对方法[J].油气储运, 2017,36(7):775-780,794. SUN H, SHUAI J. Comparison method on internal inspection data of long distance pipeline[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2017, 36(7): 775-780, 794.
[14] 王良军,李强,梁菁嬿.长输管道内检测数据比对国内外现状及发展趋势[J].油气储运,2015,34(3):233-236. WANG L J, LI Q, LIANG J Y. Current status and development trend of in-line inspection data comparison of long-distance pipeline in China and abroad[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2015, 34(3): 233-236.
[15] 张琳,赵晓利,李博,戴联双,张新宇,王学文,等.管道中心线应变检测系统的改进与应用[J].化工自动化及仪表,2017, 44(2):144-146,151. ZHANG L, ZHAO X L, LI B, DAI L S, ZHANG X Y, WANG X W, et al. Improvement and application of pipeline centerline strain detecting system[J]. Control and Instruments in Chemical Industry, 2017, 44(2): 144-146, 151.
[16] 王翔,赵东风.不同级别腐蚀管道剩余强度评估方法对比研究[J].腐蚀科学与防护技术,2013,25(1):85-88. WANG X, ZHAO D F. Comparison of residual strength assessment methods for different grades of corroded pipelines[J]. Corrosion Science and Protection Technology, 2013, 25(1): 85-88.
[1]张晓琳,青松铸,周秀兰,等.管道内检测数据坐标化技术[J].油气储运,2021,40(06):692.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.06.013]
ZHANG Xiaolin,QING Songzhu,ZHOU Xiulan,et al.Data coordinate technology of pipeline in-line inspection[J].Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation,2021,40(02):692.[doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2021.06.013]
孙鹏,男,1988年生,工程师,2011年毕业于西南石油大学材料科学与工程专业,现主要从事管道完整性管理、管道检测与评价方面的研究工作。地址:四川省成都市高新区益州大道北段777号中航国际交流中心A座1801,610041。电话:15708463536。Email:327959590@qq.com
(收稿日期:2018-07-23;修回日期:2020-12-21;编辑:张腾)